Overall Rating Platinum
Overall Score 85.88
Liaison Sam Lubow
Submission Date March 3, 2022

STARS v2.2

Stanford University
OP-11: Sustainable Procurement

Status Score Responsible Party
Complete 3.00 / 3.00 Melissa Maigler
Sustainability Coordinator
Sustainability & Energy Management
"---" indicates that no data was submitted for this field

Does the institution have written policies, guidelines, or directives that seek to support sustainable purchasing across multiple commodity categories institution-wide?:
Yes

A copy of the policies, guidelines or directives:
---

The policies, guidelines or directives:

As part of Stanford's long-range planning effort, Stanford set the goal in spring 2018 to achieve Zero Waste by 2030. Consistent with Stanford's Zero Waste goal, the purpose of its sustainable purchasing policy is to support and facilitate the purchase of products and materials that minimize the harmful effects to the environment from their production, transportation, use and disposition. It is Stanford's preference to purchase and use environmentally preferable products whenever they perform satisfactorily and can be acquired at similar cost and quality. A related purpose is to develop and implement common purchasing programs to be used by all Stanford personnel that support suppliers of environmentally preferable products, services and practices.

For the complete policy language, please visit the following:
https://fingate.stanford.edu/purchasing-contracts/policy/responsible-purchasing https://stanford.app.box.com/v/Resp-Purch-Guidelines

Additionally, Stanford has a stated preference for contracting with minority and women-owned businesses. See https://adminguide.stanford.edu/chapter-5/subchapter-5/policy-5-5-1


Does the institution employ Life Cycle Cost Analysis (LCCA) when evaluating energy- and water-using products and systems?:
Yes

Which of the following best describes the institution’s use of LCCA?:
Institution employs LCCA as a matter of policy and standard practice when evaluating all energy- and water-using products, systems and building components

A brief description of the LCCA policy and/or practices:

To improve the cost-effectiveness of its building and renovation programs, Stanford recognizes that it must invest in designs and systems with improved long-term performance. The Guidelines for Life Cycle Cost Analysis (LCCA) instruct Project Teams to consider not only the "first costs" of a building but also long-term costs, including utilities, operations, and maintenance. The guidelines are uploaded as an attachment for this credit.


Does the institution have published sustainability criteria to be applied when evaluating chemically intensive products and services?:
Yes

A brief description of the published sustainability criteria for chemically intensive products and services:

Green cleaning products are specifically included in both Stanford's sustainable purchasing policy and sustainable purchasing guidelines. Specifically, Stanford recommends Green Seal products as environmentally preferable products, and the guidelines provide guidance on finding Green Seal products online. The vast majority of Stanford’s building space does in fact utilize Green Seal or other green cleaning products, as required through Stanford's contracts with custodial providers and groundskeepers.

Specific green cleaning products are also included in Stanford's Sustainable Purchasing Guide for Breakroom Supplies, which is meant to help departmental purchasers around campus procure sustainable supplies. The Sustainable Purchasing Guide for Breakroom Supplies can be found here: https://sustainable.stanford.edu/purchasing


Does the institution have published sustainability criteria to be applied when evaluating consumable office products?:
Yes

A brief description of the published sustainability criteria for consumable office products:

Recycled content office paper and paper products are specifically included in both Stanford's sustainable purchasing policy and sustainable purchasing guidelines previously linked.


Does the institution have published sustainability criteria to be applied when evaluating furniture and furnishings?:
No

A brief description of the published sustainability criteria for furniture and furnishings:
---

Does the institution have published sustainability criteria to be applied when evaluating Information technology (IT) and equipment?:
Yes

A brief description of the published sustainability criteria for Information Technology (IT) and equipment:

For computer purchases, 100% of recommended computers are rated EPEAT Gold. Procurement includes Energy Star requirements in all RFPs for electronic products. Stanford has worked with IT vendors to get these at an excellent price, which motivates students, faculty and staff to make the environmentally sound choice. For more details, please visit:
https://uit.stanford.edu/hardware

Additionally, Stanford is creating a holistic Managed Print Services program for Stanford
University (including Stanford Redwood City) and Stanford Health Care called Cardinal Print. The goal of Cardinal Print is to improve workflow efficiency, reduce security risks, enhance the end user experience, reduce the total cost of ownership (including expenses for equipment, consumables, maintenance, and energy), and help achieve the university's long-term sustainability goals. Details on this program are here: https://uit.stanford.edu/service/cardinal-print


Does the institution have published sustainability criteria to be applied when evaluating food service providers?:
Yes

A brief description of the published sustainability criteria for food service providers:

All of Stanford’s recent café contracts require that the vendor maintain landfill, recycling, and compost collection infrastructure consistent with the campus Zero Waste program. For any cafes where this language is not included, Stanford plans to add the language in upon renewal of the contract.


Does the institution have published sustainability criteria to be applied when evaluating garments and linens?:
No

A brief description of the published sustainability criteria for garments and linens:
---

Does the institution have published sustainability criteria to be applied when evaluating professional service providers?:
Yes

A brief description of the published sustainability criteria for professional service providers:

Stanford’s sustainable procurement guidelines state that departments must evaluate the environmental performance of vendors contracted for the provision of products and services. Additionally, Procurement has begun to evaluate sustainability within each of its spend categories, and professional services is one of the categories included in that effort to date.


Does the institution have published sustainability criteria to be applied when evaluating transportation and fuels?:
Yes

A brief description of the published sustainability criteria for transportation and fuels:

Stanford’s Sustainable Purchasing Policy calls for minimization of deliveries to campus and distance a product has to travel to get to campus. It proposes strategies such as purchasing locally or from suppliers that the department already uses to avoid the addition of new delivery routes by new suppliers.

Stanford has also contracted with an electric bus vendor to electrify the Marguerite bus fleet, which now has 41 fully electric buses. The university fleet is also on the path towards electrification with the development of a strategic plan to move the campus fleet towards fully electric or non-motorized modes of transportation on all possible vehicles over the next several years.

Finally, Stanford’s sustainable procurement guidelines specifically call for the use of remanufactured tires and products made from recycled tire rubber, as well as re-refined lubrication and hydraulic oils.


Website URL where information about the institution’s sustainable procurement program or initiatives is available:
Additional documentation to support the submission:
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
---

The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.