| Overall Rating | Silver - expired |
|---|---|
| Overall Score | 57.84 |
| Liaison | Paul Edlund |
| Submission Date | Feb. 19, 2019 |
| Executive Letter | Download |
Montana State University
PA-12: Assessing Employee Satisfaction
| Status | Score | Responsible Party |
|---|---|---|
|
0.30 / 1.00 |
Mathew
Bain Intern Office of Sustainability |
Has the institution conducted a survey or other evaluation that allows for anonymous feedback to measure employee satisfaction and engagement during the previous three years?:
Percentage of employees (staff and faculty) assessed, directly or by representative sample (0-100):
A brief description of the institution’s methodology for evaluating employee satisfaction and engagement:
In the Spring of 2018 the MSU Office of Planning and Analysis administered the Staff Climate Survey (SCS) developed by the Higher Education Research Institute (HERI) at UCLA. The SCS was designed to include measures that specifically focus on aspects related to the climate for diversity, including experiences with discrimination, and cross-racial interactions. The survey also touches on staff’s level of stress, satisfaction with their institution, and work-related experiences as staff members in postsecondary institutions. The SCS provides a snapshot of the campus climate, institutional practices, and student outcomes that can be used for campus diversity and employee satisfaction improvement efforts. Results from the Staff Climate Survey assess the campus climate from the staff perspective. Institutions can use the SCS as a tool for strategic planning and benchmarking.
A brief description of the mechanism(s) by which the institution addresses issues raised by the evaluation (including examples from the previous three years):
The results of this survey have been shared with MSU's executive council including the Chief Diversity and Inclusion Officer and Chief Human Resources Officer. The results of this survey are being used to inform current priorities and set goals in the most recent draft of MSU's strategic plan.
The website URL where information about the programs or initiatives is available:
Additional documentation to support the submission:
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.