| Overall Rating | Gold |
|---|---|
| Overall Score | 81.96 |
| Liaison | Lindsey Lyons |
| Submission Date | March 1, 2024 |
Dickinson College
PA-4: Reporting Assurance
| Status | Score | Responsible Party |
|---|---|---|
|
1.00 / 1.00 |
Lindsey
Lyons Assistant Director Center for Sustainability Education |
Has the institution completed an assurance process that provides independent affirmation that the information in its current STARS report is reported in accordance with credit criteria?:
Did the assurance process include internal review, an external audit, or both?:
The name, title, and organizational affiliation of each reviewer:
Tony Moore, Assistant Director of Editorial Services - Dickinson College
A brief description of the institution’s assurance process:
Dickinson College STARS Liaisons Ken Shultes, Neil Leary and Lindsey Lyons met with internal reviewer Tony Moore to discuss the review process. Tony reviewed each credit’s reporting field and associated information (attachments, inventories, and URLs). Using the 2.2 Review Template, Tony updated the status of each credit and where necessary, commented on areas that required revision. Ken, Neil and Lindsey then reviewed the template that Tony had completed and updated the STARS report in areas that Tony highlighted as needing revision. They also updated the review template, as necessary. Through the shared review template, Tony was able to identify when Ken, Neil and Lindsey made the necessary revisions. Tony then reviewed the updated areas to assure that correct information was presented. Tony then updated all relevant areas in the review template to reflect that all criteria were met.
Affirmation from the reviewer(s) that the report has been reviewed in full and that all identified inconsistencies and errors have been successfully addressed prior to submitting it to AASHE:
Completed STARS Review Template:
Affirmation from the reviewer(s) that the report has been reviewed in full and that all identified inconsistencies and errors have been successfully addressed prior to submitting it to AASHE (2nd review):
Completed STARS Review Template (2nd review):
Affirmation from the reviewer(s) that the report has been reviewed in full and that all identified inconsistencies and errors have been successfully addressed prior to submitting it to AASHE (3rd review):
Copy of completed STARS Review Template (3rd review):
Website URL where information about the institution’s reporting assurance is available:
Additional documentation to support the submission:
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.