| Overall Rating | Silver - expired |
|---|---|
| Overall Score | 62.83 |
| Liaison | Danielle Smith |
| Submission Date | Aug. 11, 2020 |
University of New Brunswick, Fredericton
PA-4: Reporting Assurance
| Status | Score | Responsible Party |
|---|---|---|
|
1.00 / 1.00 |
Mike
Hardy Sustainability Officer Facilities Management |
Has the institution completed an assurance process that provides independent affirmation that the information in its current STARS report is reported in accordance with credit criteria?:
Did the assurance process include internal review, an external audit, or both?:
The name, title, and organizational affiliation of each reviewer:
First Review
Renée D'Souza - Sustainability Officer
Danielle Smith - Sustainability Coordinator
Nikole Watson - Energy Coordinator
Sula Levesque - Human Rights Officer
Shelley Clayton - Director, Financial Aid Office
Jennifer Morrison - University Treasurer
Sara Rogers - HR Advisor
Andrew Feicht - Manager, Environmental Health & Safety
Elizabeth Auceda - Sodexo
Krista Dixon - Director Financial Operations, ITS
Melissa Hannah - Director, Print Services
Megan Hasson - Manager, Procurement Services
Stephen Dove - Manager, Office of Institutional Analysis
Sara Rothman - Senior Director, Academic Success
Second Review
Tom Gilmore - Director of Energy and Sustainability
A brief description of the institution’s assurance process:
Key knowledge holders from across campus were identified and consulted once the data was collected to ensure that the information was correct and complete.
Once these individuals were all consulted, the Director of Energy and Sustainability reviewed the report and ensured that all information was complete and accurate.
Affirmation from the reviewer(s) that the report has been reviewed in full and that all identified inconsistencies and errors have been successfully addressed prior to submitting it to AASHE:
Completed STARS Review Template:
Affirmation from the reviewer(s) that the report has been reviewed in full and that all identified inconsistencies and errors have been successfully addressed prior to submitting it to AASHE (2nd review):
Completed STARS Review Template (2nd review):
Affirmation from the reviewer(s) that the report has been reviewed in full and that all identified inconsistencies and errors have been successfully addressed prior to submitting it to AASHE (3rd review):
Copy of completed STARS Review Template (3rd review):
Website URL where information about the institution’s reporting assurance is available:
Additional documentation to support the submission:
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.