Overall Rating | Silver |
---|---|
Overall Score | 62.34 |
Liaison | Christie-Joy Hartman |
Submission Date | Jan. 27, 2022 |
James Madison University
OP-18: Waste Minimization and Diversion
Status | Score | Responsible Party |
---|---|---|
3.02 / 8.00 |
Abram
Kaufman Energy Conservation and Sustainability Manager Facilities Management Engineering & Sustainability |
Figures needed to determine total waste generated (and diverted):
Performance Year | Baseline Year | |
Materials recycled | 577 Tons | 521 Tons |
Materials composted | 770 Tons | 0 Tons |
Materials donated or re-sold | 3 Tons | 6 Tons |
Materials disposed through post-recycling residual conversion | 0 Tons | 0 Tons |
Materials disposed in a solid waste landfill or incinerator | 2,028 Tons | 2,365 Tons |
Total waste generated | 3,378 Tons | 2,892 Tons |
A brief description of the residual conversion facility:
Start and end dates of the performance year and baseline year (or three-year periods):
Start Date | End Date | |
Performance Period | July 1, 2018 | June 30, 2019 |
Baseline Period | July 1, 2008 | June 30, 2009 |
A brief description of when and why the waste generation baseline was adopted:
Figures needed to determine "Weighted Campus Users”:
Performance Year | Baseline Year | |
Number of students resident on-site | 6,139 | 5,805 |
Number of employees resident on-site | 5 | 3 |
Number of other individuals resident on-site | 0 | 0 |
Total full-time equivalent student enrollment | 21,233 | 18,225 |
Full-time equivalent of employees | 3,370 | 2,925 |
Full-time equivalent of students enrolled exclusively in distance education | 616 | 255 |
Weighted campus users | 19,526.25 | 17,123.25 |
Total waste generated per weighted campus user:
Performance Year | Baseline Year | |
Total waste generated per weighted campus user | 0.17 Tons | 0.17 Tons |
Percentage reduction in total waste generated per weighted campus user from baseline:
Percentage of materials diverted from the landfill or incinerator by recycling, composting, donating or re-selling, performance year:
Percentage of materials diverted from the landfill or incinerator (including up to 10 percent attributable to post-recycling residual conversion):
In the waste figures reported above, has the institution recycled, composted, donated and/or re-sold the following materials?:
Yes or No | |
Paper, plastics, glass, metals, and other recyclable containers | Yes |
Food | Yes |
Cooking oil | Yes |
Plant materials | Yes |
Animal bedding | No |
White goods (i.e. appliances) | Yes |
Electronics | Yes |
Laboratory equipment | No |
Furniture | Yes |
Residence hall move-in/move-out waste | Yes |
Scrap metal | Yes |
Pallets | Yes |
Tires | Yes |
Other (please specify below) | Yes |
A brief description of other materials the institution has recycled, composted, donated and/or re-sold:
Materials intended for disposal but subsequently recovered and reused on campus, performance year:
Does the institution use single stream recycling to collect standard recyclables in common areas?:
Does the institution use dual stream recycling to collect standard recyclables in common areas?:
Does the institution use multi-stream recycling to collect standard recyclables in common areas?:
Average contamination rate for the institution’s recycling program:
A brief description of any recycling quality control mechanisms employed:
A brief description of the institution's waste-related behavior change initiatives:
A brief description of the institution's waste audits and other initiatives to assess its materials management efforts and identify areas for improvement:
A brief description of the institution's procurement policies designed to prevent waste:
A brief description of the institution's surplus department or formal office supplies exchange program that facilitates reuse of materials:
A brief description of the institution's platforms to encourage peer-to-peer exchange and reuse:
The university bookstore offers over 50% of its titles for rental through Rent-a-Text as well as offering digital textbooks through BryteWave.
A brief description of the institution's limits on paper and ink consumption:
A brief description of the institution's initiatives to make materials available online by default rather than printing them:
A brief description of the institution's program to reduce residence hall move-in/move-out waste:
A brief description of the institution's programs or initiatives to recover and reuse other materials intended for disposal:
Through the compost program, JMU collects and sends food waste to Royal Oak Farm in Evington, Virginia. JMU purchases final products from Royal Oak Farm.
JMU collects useable items during the moving out of students from residence halls at the end of the school year. Items are donated to local homeless shelters.
JMU collects damaged and/or non-standardized sized pallets. They are sent to a vendor that produces mulch with the materials.
Website URL where information about the institution’s waste minimization and diversion efforts is available:
Additional documentation to support the submission:
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
The compost program at JMU began in January of 2010. For this reason, baseline figure for “Materials composted” in part 1 and 2 is 0.
Based on guidance from Jordan Schanda with AASHE on 10/11/18, landscape material that JMU sends to the landfill that is chipped and used as a soil substitute for alternative daily cover (ADC) is counted under the landfill category. When JMU reports waste data to Virginia DEQ this material is counted towards our recycling rate per their guidelines.
Reviewed by Amanda Bodle, Program Manager, ISNW, and Abram Kaufman, Sustainability and Energy Conservation Manager, Facilities Management.
All data entered for the performance year is from FY 2018-2019. This year was chosen due to effects of the COVID-19 pandemic for FY 2019-2020 and FY 2020-2021. Therefore, figures used to calculate "weighted campus users" differ from those of PRE-5 which uses FY 2020-2021.
The compost program at JMU began in January of 2010. For this reason, baseline figure for “Materials composted” in part 1 and 2 is 0.
Based on guidance from Jordan Schanda with AASHE on 10/11/18, landscape material that JMU sends to the landfill that is chipped and used as a soil substitute for alternative daily cover (ADC) is counted under the landfill category. When JMU reports waste data to Virginia DEQ this material is counted towards our recycling rate per their guidelines.
Reviewed by Amanda Bodle, Program Manager, ISNW, and Abram Kaufman, Sustainability and Energy Conservation Manager, Facilities Management.
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.