| Overall Rating | Gold - expired |
|---|---|
| Overall Score | 68.31 |
| Liaison | Lisa Noriega |
| Submission Date | Aug. 3, 2020 |
Yale University
OP-1: Emissions Inventory and Disclosure
| Status | Score | Responsible Party |
|---|---|---|
|
1.73 / 3.00 |
Lindsay
Crum Chief Manager for Sustainability Operations & Strategic Data Yale Office of Sustainability |
"---"
indicates that no data was submitted for this field
Part 1. Greenhouse gas emissions inventory
Yes
A copy of the most recent GHG emissions inventory:
A brief description of the methodology and/or tool used to complete the GHG emissions inventory:
Yale began reporting on its GHG emissions in 2005, when it set a goal to reduce emissions by 43% from 2005 levels by 2020. These emissions were defined as purchased electricity that passes through Yale's Central Power Plant, Sterling Power Plant, and Central Campus Chiller Plant, along with all gas and oil that is consumed by Yale's Central Power Plant and Sterling Power Plant.
Yale also recently began reporting its GHG emissions to The Climate Registry (TCR), using TCR's General Reporting Protocol. Emissions are quantified using standardized methodologies, and is consistent with the World Resources Institute's Greenhouse Gas Protocol Corporate Standard, which is recognized as an international best practice. We will be transitioning solely to TCR in 2020, which is the end date for our current GHG emissions reduction goal.
Yale also recently began reporting its GHG emissions to The Climate Registry (TCR), using TCR's General Reporting Protocol. Emissions are quantified using standardized methodologies, and is consistent with the World Resources Institute's Greenhouse Gas Protocol Corporate Standard, which is recognized as an international best practice. We will be transitioning solely to TCR in 2020, which is the end date for our current GHG emissions reduction goal.
Has the GHG emissions inventory been validated internally by personnel who are independent of the GHG accounting and reporting process and/or verified by an independent, external third party?:
No
A brief description of the GHG inventory verification process:
The inventory conducted for The Climate Registry has been verified by an external third party. The inventory included here (which is using the methodology consistent with our 2005 baseline) has not been externally verified.
Documentation to support the GHG inventory verification process:
---
Scope 1 GHG emissions
| Weight in MTCO2e | |
| Stationary combustion | 197,431 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent |
| Other sources (mobile combustion, process emissions, fugitive emissions) | 3,461 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent |
Total gross Scope 1 GHG emissions, performance year:
200,892
Metric tons of CO2 equivalent
Scope 2 GHG emissions
| Weight in MTCO2e | |
| Imported electricity | 9,929 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent |
| Imported thermal energy | 0 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent |
Total gross Scope 2 GHG emissions, performance year:
9,929
Metric tons of CO2 equivalent
GHG emissions from biomass combustion
0
Metric tons of CO2 equivalent
Scope 3 GHG emissions
| Yes or No | Weight in MTCO2e | |
| Business travel | Yes | 5,441 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent |
| Commuting | Yes | 27,975 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent |
| Purchased goods and services | Yes | 305,068 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent |
| Capital goods | No | --- |
| Fuel- and energy-related activities not included in Scope 1 or Scope 2 | No | --- |
| Waste generated in operations | No | --- |
| Other sources | No | --- |
Total Scope 3 GHG emissions, performance year:
338,484
Metric tons of CO2 equivalent
A brief description of how the institution accounted for its Scope 3 emissions:
Commuting data comes from our bi-annual transportation survey; PG&S data comes from spenddata from our procurement department; and business travel data comes from a combination of spend data (from trip reimbursements) and data from Egencia (our travel booking website). It should be noted that while these categories are the only three reflected as part of this version of our GHG emissions inventory, we have a much more robust Scope 3 data tracking system linked to our Climate Registry efforts. As part of this effort, we are measuring business travel, commuting, all purchased goods & services (as opposed to just a subset), capital goods, FERA, and waste generated in operations. All of this information will be reflected in our next submission to STARS, because at that point we will have met our 2020 goal and be reporting on our inventory exclusively through TCR.
Part 2. Air pollutant emissions inventory
Yes
Annual weight of emissions for::
| Weight of Emissions | |
| Nitrogen oxides (NOx) | 17.48 Tons |
| Sulfur oxides (SOx) | 4.83 Tons |
| Carbon monoxide (CO) | 8.10 Tons |
| Particulate matter (PM) | 7.20 Tons |
| Ozone (O3) | 0 Tons |
| Lead (Pb) | 0 Tons |
| Hazardous air pollutants (HAPs) | 0 Tons |
| Ozone-depleting compounds (ODCs) | 0 Tons |
| Other standard categories of air emissions identified in permits and/or regulations | 10.10 Tons |
Do the air pollutant emissions figures provided include the following sources?:
| Yes or No | |
| Major stationary sources | Yes |
| Area sources | No |
| Mobile sources | No |
| Commuting | No |
| Off-site electricity production | No |
None
A brief description of the methodology(ies) the institution used to complete its air emissions inventory:
The reported emissions of criteria air pollutants are calculated based upon using the best available method for each emission source and each pollutant. We have NOx CEMS (Continuous Emission Monitoring Systems) on 10 of our Powerplant units (4 Turbines, 3 Boilers and 3 Generators). CEMS are certified emissions measurement systems that have daily calibration tests and quarterly QA/QC requirements. For the other pollutants for the same Powerplant units we use fuel usage multiplied by an emission factor. We also have some Boilers that do not require CEMS so we use their fuel usage for NOx and the other pollutants. For the emission factors, if we have recent test data we will use that for the emission factors. If we do not have test data we use emission factors published in EPA AP-42 documents. For emergency generators we may not have fuel usage so we use runtime and multiply that by the maximum firing rate to get fuel usage. This may overstate fuel usage a bit, but these units run very little so this is acceptable. Then we use either manufacturer’s published emission test data or EPA AP-42.
Optional Fields
---
Gross Scope 2 GHG emissions from imported thermal energy (location-based) :
---
Website URL where information about the institution’s emissions inventories is available:
---
Additional documentation to support the submission:
---
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
Ozone, lead, hazardous air pollutants, and ozone-depleting compounds not available.
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.