Overall Rating Reporter
Overall Score
Liaison Timothy Sundrup
Submission Date March 7, 2025

STARS v3.0

Xavier University
PA-3: Institutional Governance

Status Score Responsible Party
Complete Reporter
"---" indicates that no data was submitted for this field

3.1 Student participation in governance

Does the institution have one or more ongoing bodies through which students can democratically participate in the governance of the institution?:
Yes

Narrative and/or website URL outlining the ongoing bodies through which students can democratically participate in the governance of the institution:

Student Government Association exists to continuously improve the university and develop all undergraduate students, part-time and full-time, traditional and non-traditional alike. SGA provides a forum for civic training and student participation in university governance and strives to preserve the rights of all students.

https://www.xavier.edu/sga/index


Are one or more student representatives included as members of the institution’s highest decision-making body?:
No

Narrative and/or website URL outlining student representation on the institution’s highest decision-making body:
---

Does at least one student representative have voting rights on the highest decision-making body?:
---

Description of other mechanisms used to consult students on institutional decisions, plans, or policies:
---

The Reporting Tool will automatically calculate the following figure:

Points earned for indicator PA 3.1:
0.50

3.2 Academic staff participation in governance

Does the institution have one or more ongoing bodies through which academic staff can democratically participate in the governance of the institution?:
Yes

Narrative and/or website URL outlining the ongoing bodies through which academic staff can democratically participate in the governance of the institution:

Xavier University is committed to shared governance through a variety of standing Academic and University Committees including the Faculty Committee, Staff Committee, Core Curriculum Committee, University Rank and Tenure Committee, and many more.

https://www.xavier.edu/provost/shared-governance/index


Are one or more academic staff representatives included as members of the institution’s highest decision-making body?:
No

Narrative and/or website URL outlining academic staff representation on the institution’s highest decision-making body:
---

Does at least one academic staff representative have voting rights on the institution’s highest decision-making body?:
---

Description of other mechanisms used to consult academic staff on institutional decisions, plans, or policies:
---

The Reporting Tool will automatically calculate the following figure:

Points earned for indicator PA 3.2:
0.50

3.3 Non-academic staff participation in governance

Does the institution have one or more ongoing bodies through which non-academic staff can democratically participate in the governance of the institution?:
Yes

Narrative and/or website URL outlining the ongoing bodies through which non-academic staff can democratically participate in the governance of the institution:

The Staff Committee provides a forum for open communication and on-going dialogue between exempt and non-exempt staff employees and administration on University strategic direction and initiatives. The Staff Committee reports to the Office of the President.

https://www.xavier.edu/staff-advisory/index


Are one or more staff members representing non-managerial workers included as members of the institution’s highest decision-making body?:
No

Narrative and/or website URL outlining non-academic staff representation on the institution’s highest decision-making body:
---

Does at least one staff member representing non-managerial workers have voting rights on the institution’s highest decision-making body?:
---

Description of other mechanisms used to consult non-academic staff on institutional decisions, plans, or policies:
---

The Reporting Tool will automatically calculate the following figure:

Points earned for indicator PA 3.3:
0.50

3.4 Community participation in governance

Does the institution have one or more ongoing bodies through which local community-based organizations not affiliated with the institution can democratically participate in its governance?:
No

Narrative and/or website URL outlining the ongoing bodies through which local community-based organizations can democratically participate in the governance of the institution:
---

Has the institution used one or more ad hoc mechanisms during the previous three years to consult local community members on institutional decisions, plans, or policies?:
No

Narrative and/or website URL outlining the ad hoc mechanisms used during the previous three years to consult local community members on institutional decisions, plans, or policies:
---

The Reporting Tool will automatically calculate the following figure:

Points earned for indicator PA 3.4:
0

Optional documentation

Notes about the information provided for this credit:

We are assuming the Board of Trustees is the highest governing body.


Additional documentation for this credit:
---

The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.