Overall Rating Silver - expired
Overall Score 47.51
Liaison Mike Evans
Submission Date Feb. 2, 2016
Executive Letter Download

STARS v2.0

Williams College
PA-3: Governance

Status Score Responsible Party
Complete 1.50 / 3.00 Amy Johns
Director
Zilkha Center for Environmental Initiatives
"---" indicates that no data was submitted for this field

None
Do all enrolled students, regardless of type or status, have an avenue to participate in one or more governance bodies (through direct participation or the election of representatives)?:
Yes

None
A brief description of the mechanisms through which students have an avenue to participate in one or more governance bodies:
All students are eligible to run for the student-elected college council, all students can come to college council meetings, all students can submit a resolution to college council. All students can participate in a campus decision-making committee.

None
Is there at least one student representative on the institution’s governing body who was elected by peers or appointed by a representative student body or organization?:
No

None
A brief description of student representation on the governing body, including how the representatives are selected:
---

None
Do students have a formal role in decision-making in regard to the following?:
Yes or No
Establishing organizational mission, vision, and/or goals Yes
Establishing new policies, programs, or initiatives Yes
Strategic and long-term planning Yes
Existing or prospective physical resources Yes
Budgeting, staffing and financial planning Yes
Communications processes and transparency practices No
Prioritization of programs and projects Yes

None
A brief description of the formal student role in regard to each area indicated, including examples from the previous three years:
Students serve an active (voting) role on all of the major college committees, including the Committee on Priority of Resources and the Committee on Educational Policy, that make policy recommendations to the Board of Trustees. These committees are effectively responsible for the operations of the school. There have been, and continue to be, students serving on these committees for the past three years.

None
Do all staff, regardless of type or status, have an avenue to participate in one or more governance bodies (through direct participation or the election of representatives)?:
No

None
A brief description of the mechanisms through which all staff have an avenue to participate in one or more governance bodies:
---

None
Is there at least one non-supervisory staff representative on the institution’s governing body who was elected by peers or appointed by a representative staff body or organization?:
No

None
A brief description of non-supervisory staff representation on the governing body, including how the representatives are selected:
---

None
Do non-supervisory staff have a formal role in decision-making in regard to the following? :
Yes or No
Establishing organizational mission, vision, and/or goals No
Establishing new policies, programs, or initiatives No
Strategic and long-term planning No
Existing or prospective physical resources No
Budgeting, staffing and financial planning No
Communications processes and transparency practices No
Prioritization of programs and projects No

None
A brief description of the formal staff role in regard to each area indicated, including examples from the previous three years:
---

None
Do all faculty, regardless of type or status, have an avenue to participate in one or more governance bodies (through direct participation or the election of representatives)?:
No

None
A brief description of the mechanisms through which all faculty (including adjunct faculty) have an avenue to participate in one or more governance bodies:
---

None
Is there at least one teaching or research faculty representative on the institution’s governing body who was elected by peers or appointed by a representative faculty body or organization?:
No

None
A brief description of faculty representation on the governing body, including how the representatives are selected:
---

None
Do faculty have a formal role in decision-making in regard to the following?:
Yes or No
Establishing organizational mission, vision, and/or goals Yes
Establishing new policies, programs, or initiatives Yes
Strategic and long-term planning Yes
Existing or prospective physical resources Yes
Budgeting, staffing and financial planning Yes
Communications processes and transparency practices Yes
Prioritization of programs and projects Yes

None
A brief description of the formal faculty role in regard to each area indicated, including examples from the previous three years:
Our governance bodies consist of the following: administrative appointments held by faculty (Dean of Faculty, Associate Dean of Faculty, Associate Dean for Institutional Diversity, Dean of the College, Provost) standing committees (both appointed and elected) ad hoc committees (usually appointed by the committees or senior staff needing ad hoc work) academic departments interdisciplinary program advisory committees (the governing bodies of these academic units) advisory committees for parts of the college such as the 62 Center, WCMA full faculty (for votes at monthly faculty meetings) First-year tenure-track faculty are not appointed to standing committees but immediately become members of their academic units and are voting members at faculty meetings and sometimes get involved in ad hoc work.

None
The website URL where information about the institution’s governance structure is available:
---

Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
---

The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.