Overall Rating | Silver |
---|---|
Overall Score | 61.15 |
Liaison | Ashley Woolman |
Submission Date | April 8, 2022 |
Western Colorado University
OP-1: Emissions Inventory and Disclosure
Status | Score | Responsible Party |
---|---|---|
1.56 / 3.00 |
Ashley
Woolman Sustainability Coordinator Facilities Services |
"---"
indicates that no data was submitted for this field
Part 1. Greenhouse gas emissions inventory
Yes
A copy of the most recent GHG emissions inventory:
A brief description of the methodology and/or tool used to complete the GHG emissions inventory:
1. Billing records from energy purchases, 2. electricity fuels mix provided by utility, 3. travel records, 4. online voluntary commuter survey, and 5. waste and recycling volume records. 5. Using the Sustainability Indicator Management & Analysis Platform (SIMAP), these measures were converted to GHG emissions.
Has the GHG emissions inventory been validated internally by personnel who are independent of the GHG accounting and reporting process and/or verified by an independent, external third party?:
No
A brief description of the GHG inventory verification process:
---
Documentation to support the GHG inventory verification process:
---
Scope 1 GHG emissions
Weight in MTCO2e | |
Stationary combustion | 3,863 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent |
Other sources (mobile combustion, process emissions, fugitive emissions) | 267 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent |
Total gross Scope 1 GHG emissions, performance year:
4,130
Metric tons of CO2 equivalent
Scope 2 GHG emissions
Weight in MTCO2e | |
Imported electricity | 5,169 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent |
Imported thermal energy | 0 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent |
Total gross Scope 2 GHG emissions, performance year:
5,169
Metric tons of CO2 equivalent
GHG emissions from biomass combustion
0
Metric tons of CO2 equivalent
Scope 3 GHG emissions
Yes or No | Weight in MTCO2e | |
Business travel | --- | --- |
Commuting | Yes | 1,882 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent |
Purchased goods and services | Yes | 5 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent |
Capital goods | --- | --- |
Fuel- and energy-related activities not included in Scope 1 or Scope 2 | --- | --- |
Waste generated in operations | Yes | 448 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent |
Other sources | --- | --- |
Total Scope 3 GHG emissions, performance year:
2,335
Metric tons of CO2 equivalent
A brief description of how the institution accounted for its Scope 3 emissions:
1. A commuting survey was sent to the whole Western community to determine methods of travel. 2. A inventory report from the food contractor, Sodexo was assessed to determine the amount of food purchased (by weight) for the fiscal year. Other goods and services purchased include campus paper purchases for the fiscal year. 3. Waste generated in operations was taken from data recorded during the Race to 0 Waste campaign, in which waste that is deposited in dumpsters across campus was estimated by volume-weight conversions. 4. Using the Sustainability Indicator Management & Analysis Platform (SIMAP), these measures were converted to GHG emissions.
Part 2. Air pollutant emissions inventory
No
Annual weight of emissions for::
Weight of Emissions | |
Nitrogen oxides (NOx) | --- |
Sulfur oxides (SOx) | --- |
Carbon monoxide (CO) | --- |
Particulate matter (PM) | --- |
Ozone (O3) | --- |
Lead (Pb) | --- |
Hazardous air pollutants (HAPs) | --- |
Ozone-depleting compounds (ODCs) | --- |
Other standard categories of air emissions identified in permits and/or regulations | --- |
Do the air pollutant emissions figures provided include the following sources?:
Yes or No | |
Major stationary sources | --- |
Area sources | --- |
Mobile sources | --- |
Commuting | --- |
Off-site electricity production | --- |
None
A brief description of the methodology(ies) the institution used to complete its air emissions inventory:
---
Optional Fields
5,169
Metric tons of CO2 equivalent
Gross Scope 2 GHG emissions from imported thermal energy (location-based) :
---
Website URL where information about the institution’s emissions inventories is available:
---
Additional documentation to support the submission:
---
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
---
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.