| Overall Rating | Silver |
|---|---|
| Overall Score | 61.40 |
| Liaison | Justin Owen |
| Submission Date | April 25, 2022 |
Weber State University
PA-13: Assessing Employee Satisfaction
| Status | Score | Responsible Party |
|---|---|---|
|
1.00 / 1.00 |
Jennifer
Bodine Sustainability Specialist Facilities Management |
"---"
indicates that no data was submitted for this field
Has the institution conducted a survey or other evaluation that allows for anonymous feedback to measure employee satisfaction and engagement during the previous three years?:
Yes
Percentage of employees assessed, directly or by representative sample:
100
A brief description of the institution’s methodology for evaluating employee satisfaction and engagement:
WSU administers a staff satisfaction and a separate faculty survey every three years. On a different three-year cycle, we administer the Great Colleges to Work for Survey.
The Great College to Work For survey which assesses satisfaction with the following:
- Job satisfaction and support
- Teaching environment
- Professional development
- Compensation, benefits, and work/life balance
- Facilities
- Policies, resources, and efficiency
- Shared governance
- Pride
- Supervisors/Department Chairs
- Senior leadership
- Faculty, administration, and staff relations
- Communication
- Collaboration
- Fairness
- Respect and appreciation
In 2021, WSU made it on the Great Colleges to Work for Honor Roll List - https://greatcollegesprogram.com/list/colleges/
The Great College to Work For survey which assesses satisfaction with the following:
- Job satisfaction and support
- Teaching environment
- Professional development
- Compensation, benefits, and work/life balance
- Facilities
- Policies, resources, and efficiency
- Shared governance
- Pride
- Supervisors/Department Chairs
- Senior leadership
- Faculty, administration, and staff relations
- Communication
- Collaboration
- Fairness
- Respect and appreciation
In 2021, WSU made it on the Great Colleges to Work for Honor Roll List - https://greatcollegesprogram.com/list/colleges/
A brief description of the mechanism(s) by which the institution addresses issues raised by the evaluation:
Results are primarily distributed to vice presidents to assist in planning efforts. Results are also shared with the staff advisory council and faculty senate. All Vice Presidents are required to come up with a plan for addressing the concerns and submit that report to the University President.
Optional Fields
Additional documentation to support the submission:
---
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
https://www.weber.edu/WSUToday/092121_GreatColleges.html
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.