Overall Rating | Silver - expired |
---|---|
Overall Score | 55.60 |
Liaison | Jane Stewart |
Submission Date | March 6, 2020 |
Washington and Lee University
OP-14: Office Paper Purchasing
Status | Score | Responsible Party |
---|---|---|
0.28 / 1.00 |
Michael
Rhodes Manager, Copying Center Copy Services |
"---"
indicates that no data was submitted for this field
Total annual expenditures on office paper:
81,316.40
US/Canadian $
Expenditures on office paper with the following levels of post-consumer recycled, agricultural residue, and/or FSC certified content::
Expenditure Per Level | |
10-29 percent | 0 US/Canadian $ |
30-49 percent | 0 US/Canadian $ |
50-69 percent | 0 US/Canadian $ |
70-89 percent (or FSC Mix label) | 28,139.65 US/Canadian $ |
90-100 percent (or FSC Recycled/100% label) | 0 US/Canadian $ |
A brief description of the time period from which the figures reported above are drawn:
We were only able to pull this current fiscal year's sales numbers, 7/1/2019-2/28/2020 from the Manager of Copying Services. We used this as a sample to generate the total expenditures for this fiscal year. (We attempted to get numbers for last fiscal year to match the performance years used elsewhere in our report, but were unable to.)
W&L does not track paper based on percentage of recycled content. We only have a category to see "FSC Rated" paper purchasing. It says these purchases fall into the "FSC Mix" and "FSC Recycled" categories, but we are unable to separate these two categories. It looks like the majority of the paper purchases fall under "FSC Mix", so we are lumping all "FSC Rated" into the "FSC Mix" category.
W&L does not track paper based on percentage of recycled content. We only have a category to see "FSC Rated" paper purchasing. It says these purchases fall into the "FSC Mix" and "FSC Recycled" categories, but we are unable to separate these two categories. It looks like the majority of the paper purchases fall under "FSC Mix", so we are lumping all "FSC Rated" into the "FSC Mix" category.
Optional Fields
---
Additional documentation to support the submission:
---
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
---
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.