Overall Rating Gold - expired
Overall Score 67.20
Liaison Anne Duncan
Submission Date Jan. 29, 2015
Executive Letter Download

STARS v2.0

Wartburg College
IN-1: Innovation 1

Status Score Responsible Party
Complete 1.00 / 1.00 Anne Duncan
Environmental Sustainability Coordinator
Sustainability
"---" indicates that no data was submitted for this field

Title or keywords related to the innovative policy, practice, program, or outcome:
Advanced Waste Management

A brief description of the innovative policy, practice, program, or outcome :

Although recycling in higher education is not innovative, we believe we have taken several steps which are not common practice.

In spring 2014 our recycling partner, the City of Waverly, began transitioning their curbside recycling to single stream, placing plastic, paper, and metals in one container. Prior to this change items needed to be sorted. This sorting requirement meant we were able to place few recycling stations in academic areas as they took a lot of space. Most colleges would stop at just adding more containers, but we took the opportunity to make major changes.

Our goal of the changes was to increase diversion by placing the waste management process in the hands of the user.

First, we added more Recycling and Waste Stations in public areas, within 50 -100 feet of every workspace, allowing easy access for recycling and landfill (trash) items. Prior to this change we had 1-6 stations per building, usually tucked in a corner, away from traffic. The containers are in main traffic paths, and now a very visible part of our campus.

The second change was adding side-saddle receptacles, attached to existing containers in offices for waste diversion. Instead of purchasing all new containers, we cleaned up the existing trash containers, added a recycling label, and hung the side-saddles on them for trash collection. The second part of this change asked users to empty their recycling and waste at the stations hallway. Prior to this change, cleaning staff emptied trash containers, but not recycling, and process which deincentivizes users to divert by making it easier to throw stuff away. Our change put landfill and diversion as equals, leaving it to user to chose how to handle their waste. Our cleaning staff no longer have to visit each office to empty trash, saving them time, allowing us to save costs of staffing, which was done through attrition, not layoffs.

Third, waste containers were removed from lecture classrooms. Our classrooms do not generate waste, it was not logical to collect waste from them. Just like the national parks service, we ask our student to take out anything they bring in. Signs were provided to help during the transition.

Although some colleges have adopted some of these practices, we are unaware of any which has adopted all of them. Asking all your staff, including faculty and administration, campuswide, to take out their own trash, is not common practice and demonstrates the innovative change on campus.


A brief description of any positive measurable outcomes associated with the innovation (if not reported above):

We saw an 86% increase in recycling from 12/13 to 13/14 years. Considering the recycling changes did not actually change until 3/4 of the way through the fiscal year, the changes are more reflective of the increased awareness. Once the changes actually happened, we were unable to get accurate measurements on recycling due to a malfunctioning truck scale. However, we have seen reduction in landfill collection, and believe this is an indicator of changes to come. The equipment has been fixed, and as of January 2015 we have started collecting weights to have data going forward.


A letter of affirmation from an individual with relevant expertise:
Which of the following STARS subcategories does the innovation most closely relate to? (Select all that apply up to a maximum of 5):
Yes or No
Curriculum No
Research No
Campus Engagement No
Public Engagement No
Air & Climate No
Buildings No
Dining Services No
Energy No
Grounds No
Purchasing No
Transportation No
Waste Yes
Water No
Coordination, Planning & Governance No
Diversity & Affordability No
Health, Wellbeing & Work No
Investment No

Other topic(s) that the innovation relates to that are not listed above:
---

The website URL where information about the innovation is available :
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
---

The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.