Overall Rating Gold - expired
Overall Score 72.78
Liaison Emily Vollmer
Submission Date Feb. 18, 2021

STARS v2.2

Virginia Tech
OP-22: Rainwater Management

Status Score Responsible Party
Complete 2.00 / 2.00 Chuck Dietz
Stormwater Compliance Engineer
Site & Infrastructure Development
"---" indicates that no data was submitted for this field

Which of the following best describes the institution’s approach to rainwater management?:
Comprehensive policies, plans or guidelines that require LID practices for all new projects

A brief description of the institution’s green infrastructure and LID practices:
Virginia Tech developments that disturb one acre or more are required to comply with the water quantity and water quality technical criteria of Virginia Tech’s Annual Standards and Specifications for Erosion and Sediment Control and Stormwater Management, based on the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality’s water quantity and water quality regulations. In addition to peak flow rate, velocity, and volume controls, these criteria require a reduction in site nutrient discharge using some type of LID practice, either through a decrease in impervious cover or through the implementation of stormwater runoff treatment in a water quality facility such as a bioretention filter.

The criteria are more stringent for Virginia Tech developments in the Chesapeake Bay watershed, where land disturbances of 2,500 square feet or more are subject to these same water quantity and water quality requirements.

A copy of the institution’s rainwater management policy, plan, and/or guidelines:
A brief description of the institution’s rainwater management policy, plan, and/or guidelines that supports the responses above:
The latest version of Virginia Tech’s Annual Standards and Specifications for Erosion and Sediment Control and Stormwater Management is attached.

Optional Fields 

Website URL where information about the institution’s green infrastructure and LID practices is available:
Additional documentation to support the submission:
---

Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
---

The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.