Overall Rating | Silver - expired |
---|---|
Overall Score | 50.80 |
Liaison | Aldo Pierini |
Submission Date | March 27, 2018 |
Executive Letter | Download |
Villanova University
OP-11: Sustainable Procurement
Status | Score | Responsible Party |
---|---|---|
0.00 / 3.00 |
Part 1: Institution-Wide Policies
A copy of the policies, guidelines or directives:
The policies, guidelines or directives:
Part 2: Life Cycle Cost Analysis
Which of the following best describes the institution’s use of LCCA?:
A brief description of the LCCA policy and/or practices:
Part 3: Commodity-Specific Sustainability Criteria
To count, the criteria must address the specific sustainability challenges and impacts associated with products/services in each category, e.g. by requiring or giving preference to multi-criteria sustainability standards, certifications and labels appropriate to the category. Broader, institution-wide policies should be reported in Part 1, above.
Chemically Intensive Products and Services
A brief description of the published sustainability criteria for chemically intensive products and services:
Construction and Renovation
A brief description of the published sustainability criteria for construction and renovation products:
Information Technology (IT)
A brief description of the published sustainability criteria for IT products and services:
Food Services
A brief description of the published sustainability criteria for food services:
Garments and Linens
A brief description of the published sustainability criteria for garments and linens:
Professional Services
A brief description of the published sustainability criteria for professional services:
Transportation and Fuels
A brief description of the published sustainability criteria for transportation and fuels:
Wood and Paper
A brief description of the published sustainability criteria for wood and paper products:
Other Commodity Categories
A brief description of the published sustainability criteria for other commodity categories:
Optional Fields
Additional documentation to support the submission:
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.