Overall Rating Gold
Overall Score 72.06
Liaison Dave Barbier
Submission Date March 22, 2024

STARS v2.2

University of Wisconsin-Stevens Point
AC-2: Learning Outcomes

Status Score Responsible Party
Complete 8.00 / 8.00 Sergio Romero
Data Analyst
Office of Sustainability
"---" indicates that no data was submitted for this field

Part 1. Institutional sustainability learning outcomes

Has the institution adopted one or more sustainability learning outcomes that apply to the entire student body or, at minimum, to the institution's predominant student body?:
Yes

Which of the following best describes the sustainability learning outcomes?:
Sustainability-focused

A list of the institution level sustainability learning outcomes:

U.S. Diversity 1. Describe how people or institutions in the United States have constructed diverse identities and cultures based on ability, ethnicity, gender, language, nationality, race, religion, sexuality, socio-economic status, etc. 2. Explain how individuals or groups in the United States have responded to the experience of discrimination and inequality. 3. Demonstrate understanding of and empathetic insight about diverse cultural perspectives in the United States. Global Awareness 1. Identify the key components found within one or more cultures that are distinct from those found in predominantly English-speaking cultures. 2. Analyze key forces or processes that contribute to global interconnectedness, and their implications. 3. Demonstrate curiosity and empathetic insight about diverse cultural perspectives. Environmental Responsibility 1. Identify interactions between human society and the natural environment. 2. Analyze the individual, social, cultural, and ecological factors that influence environmental sustainability. 3. Evaluate competing claims that inform environmental debates. Critical Thinking 1. Recognize critical thinking as a process of identifying, analyzing, evaluating, and constructing reasoning in deciding what conclusions to draw (argumentation) or actions to take (decision-making and problem-solving). 2. Identify, analyze, evaluate, and construct reasoning as it is applied to general or discipline specific questions or issues. 3. Communicate the analysis, evaluation, or construction of reasoning orally, visually, or in writing. Written Communication 1. Compose an articulate, thoughtful, grammatically correct, and logically organized piece of writing with properly documented and supported ideas, evidence, and information suitable to the topic, purpose, genre, and audience. 2. Apply your understanding of elements that shape successful writing to critique and improve your own and others’ writing through effective and useful feedback. Quantitative Literacy 1. Select, analyze, and interpret appropriate numerical data used in everyday life in numerical and graphical format. 2. Identify and apply appropriate strategies of quantitative problem solving in theoretical and practical applications. 3. Construct a conclusion using quantitative justification. Wellness 1. Assess your own wellness in each of the seven dimensions of wellness and explain how the dimensions and the interactions among them impact your overall personal health and well being. 2. Develop an individual plan for healthy living that demonstrates an understanding of the principles of wellness. Arts 1. Describe, analyze or critique creative works utilizing knowledge of relevant aesthetic criteria or stylistic forms. Do at least ONE of the following: 2. Identify and explain the relationship between particular traditions or genres of creative expression and their social, historical or cultural contexts. 3. Demonstrate an understanding of creative expression by producing or performing a creative work. Humanities 1. Read closely, think critically, and write effectively about texts or cultural artifacts that reflect on perennial questions concerning the human condition (such as the search for truth and meaning, the confrontation with suffering and mortality, or the struggle for justice, equality, and human dignity). 2. Investigate and thoughtfully respond to a variety of ideas, beliefs or values held by persons in situations other than one’s own. Historical Perspectives 1. Use primary sources as evidence to answer questions about historical change. 2. Describe differences among interpretations of the past. 2. Analyze institutional and cultural changes in one or more human societies over time. Natural Sciences (includes required lab component) 1. Explain major concepts, methods, or theories in the natural sciences to investigate the physical world. 2. Interpret information, solve problems, and make decisions by applying natural science concepts, methods, and quantitative techniques. 3. Describe the relevance of aspects of the natural sciences to their lives and society. Social Sciences 1. Explain or apply major concepts, methods, or theories used in the social sciences to investigate, analyze, or predict human behavior. 2. Examine and explain how social, cultural, or political institutions influence individuals or groups. Upon completion of the GEP curriculum, students will be able to: 1. Demonstrate critical thinking, quantitative, and communication skills necessary to succeed in a rapidly changing global society. 2. Demonstrate broad knowledge of the physical, social, and cultural worlds as well as the methods by which this knowledge is produced. 3. Recognize that responsible global citizenship involves personal accountability, social equity, and environmental sustainability.


Part 2. Program-level sustainability learning outcomes

Total number of graduates from degree programs:
1,569

Number of graduates from degree programs that require an understanding of the concept of sustainability:
397

A brief description of how the figure above was determined:

The figures above are from the 22-23 academic year. I totaled all of the students who graduated from one of our 3 campuses in the 22-23 school year with an associates, undergrad, or graduate degree and marked whether their programs contained sustainability content based on the academic course inventory from AC-1.


A list of degree programs that require an understanding of the concept of sustainability:

Aquaculture/Fish Culture


Biology


Brewing Science


Business Economics


Captive Wildlife


Community and Organizational Leadership


Community Sustainability


Conservation and Community Planning


Conservation Biology


Conservation Law Enforcement


Earth Science


Ecosystem Restoration and Management


Educational Sustainability


Environmental Education


Environmental Ethics


Environmental Geography


Environmental Justice


Environmental Science and Management


Environmental Studies


Equity and Inclusion in Education


Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences


Food and Nutrition for Health and Wellness


Forest Management


Forest Recreation


Forestry


Geographic Information Systems and Spatial Science


Geographic Information Systems


Geospatial Sciences


History and Social Studies


Education


History


Hydrology


Interior Architecture


International Relations


Law and Policy


Master of Natural Resources


Master of Natural Resources (Protected)


Museum Studies


Native American and Indigenous Studies


Natural Science Education


Paper Science and Engineering


Peace Studies


Philosophy: Environmental Ethics


Political Science


Race and Ethnicity Social Justice and Equity


Resource Management


Soil Science and Land Management


Sustainable and Resilient Food Systems


Sustainable Food and Nutrition


Urban and Community Forestry


Urban Planning and Geodesign


Waste Management and Environmental Protection


Water Resources


Wildlife Ecology and Management


Wildlife Education


Documentation supporting the figure reported above (upload):
Do the figures reported above cover one, two, or three academic years?:
One

Percentage of students who graduate from programs that require an understanding of the concept of sustainability:
25.30

Optional Fields 

Website URL where information about the sustainability learning outcomes is available:
Additional documentation to support the submission:
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
---

The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.