Overall Rating | Gold - expired |
---|---|
Overall Score | 68.81 |
Liaison | Dave Barbier |
Submission Date | July 17, 2012 |
Executive Letter | Download |
University of Wisconsin-Stevens Point
PAE-5: Climate Action Plan
Status | Score | Responsible Party |
---|---|---|
2.00 / 2.00 |
Shelly
Janowski Sustainability Coordinator Facility Services |
"---"
indicates that no data was submitted for this field
None
Does the institution have a plan to mitigate its greenhouse gas emissions that meets the criteria for this credit?:
Yes
None
A brief summary of the climate plan’s long-term goals:
It is our goal to reach carbon neutrality by the year 2050.
None
A brief summary of the climate plan’s short-term goals:
Based on state energy initiatives and mandates, the University of Wisconsin Stevens Point will focus on the following eleven energy strategies: 1) conservation, 2) hiring a dedicated energy manager, 3) existing building retrofits, 4) new building design, 5) computing, 6) lighting, 7) renewable energy options, 8) co-generation, 9) sustainability reserve fund, 10) purchasing policy and 11) renewable energy purchases.
In order to achieve sustainable waste management, the university must 1) eliminate or minimize certain types of waste (source reduction), 2) increase its resource recovery efforts, 3) advance its composting effort, 4) commit to 100% natural lawn care 5) improve reuse strategies 6) continue with E-waste management and 7) perhaps explore waste-to-energy opportunities.
Each direct transportation source - fleet services, commuting and air travel – has several possible solutions for reducing carbon emissions. They include 1) a reduction in student commuting, 2) a reduction in faculty and staff commuting to campus, 3) an increase in the percent of the population that uses alternative transportation, 4) a decrease in single occupancy vehicles, 5) a reduction of miles traveled for official business by faculty and staff, 6) a reduction in emissions associated with fleet operations, 7) 100% offset of air travel for faculty and staff, and 8) 100% offset for air travel for international student travel.
In addition to reducing our carbon emissions, we must also increase the level of carbon offsets. Examples include on-campus carbon sinks – like composting and managed forests, off-campus institution-funded carbon reduction projects, and the purchase of “green electricity”. The purchase of green energy and renewable energy credits should be a minor initiative towards achieving carbon neutrality.
None
Year the climate plan was formally adopted or approved:
2,011
None
An indication of whether institution has made a commitment to reduce GHG emissions a specific amount by a target year:
Yes
None
List which emissions (scope 1, 2, and/or 3) are included in its GHG emissions commitment:
1,2,3
None
The reduction level (percentage) institution has committed to:
25%
None
The baseline year the institution used in its GHG emissions commitment:
June 30, 2007
None
The baseline emissions level institution used in its GHG emissions commitment:
43,572
None
The target year the institution specified in its GHG emissions commitment :
June 30, 2020
None
The website URL where information about the climate plan is available:
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
---
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.