| Overall Rating | Silver - expired |
|---|---|
| Overall Score | 63.21 |
| Liaison | Mark Klapatch-Mathias |
| Submission Date | June 30, 2021 |
University of Wisconsin-River Falls
OP-16: Commute Modal Split
| Status | Score | Responsible Party |
|---|---|---|
|
2.14 / 5.00 |
Mark
Klapatch-Mathias Sustainability Coordinator Office of Sustainability |
"---"
indicates that no data was submitted for this field
Total full-time equivalent student enrollment:
5,441.03
Full-time equivalent of employees:
566.32
Part 1. Student commute modal split
Yes
Total percentage of students that use more sustainable commuting options as their primary mode of transportation:
45
A brief description of the method(s) used to gather data about student commuting:
Information for this credit was gathered from the UWRF Transportation/Campus Amenities Survey which was administered in October, 2017. Previous data was from 2005.
'More sustainable Commuting Options' was interpreted as any commuting method that was not driving alone in a single occupancy vehicle. The survey went out to a representative sample of students. 413 students took the survey which was 16% of students invited to participate. Given our student population, the data collected is estimated at being accurate to within =/- 4.7% with 95% confidence.
'More sustainable Commuting Options' was interpreted as any commuting method that was not driving alone in a single occupancy vehicle. The survey went out to a representative sample of students. 413 students took the survey which was 16% of students invited to participate. Given our student population, the data collected is estimated at being accurate to within =/- 4.7% with 95% confidence.
Part 2. Employee commute modal split
Yes
Total percentage of employees that use more sustainable commuting options as their primary mode of transportation:
21
A brief description of the method(s) used to gather data about employee commuting:
Information for this credit was gathered from the UWRF Transportation/Campus Amenities Survey which was administered in October, 2017. Previous data was from 2005.
'More sustainable Commuting Options' was interpreted as any commuting method that was not driving alone in a single occupancy vehicle. The survey went out to all faculty and staff. 316 faculty/staff took the survey which was 39% of those invited to participate. Given our employee population, the data collected is estimated at being accurate to within =/- 4.3% with 95% confidence.
'More sustainable Commuting Options' was interpreted as any commuting method that was not driving alone in a single occupancy vehicle. The survey went out to all faculty and staff. 316 faculty/staff took the survey which was 39% of those invited to participate. Given our employee population, the data collected is estimated at being accurate to within =/- 4.3% with 95% confidence.
Optional Fields
| Percentage of students (0-100) | Percentage of employees (0-100) | |
| Single-occupancy vehicle | 55 | 79 |
| Zero-emissions vehicle | --- | --- |
| Walk, cycle, or other non-motorized mode | 39 | 13 |
| Vanpool or carpool | 5 | 7 |
| Public transport or campus shuttle | 0 | 0 |
| Motorcycle, motorized scooter/bike, or moped | 1 | 1 |
| Distance education / telecommute | --- | 0 |
Website URL where information about student or employee commuting is available:
---
Additional documentation to support the submission:
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
---
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.