Overall Rating | Silver - expired |
---|---|
Overall Score | 46.35 |
Liaison | Alan Burr |
Submission Date | March 2, 2018 |
Executive Letter | Download |
University of Wisconsin-Platteville
PA-3: Participatory Governance
Status | Score | Responsible Party |
---|---|---|
0.75 / 3.00 |
Amy
Seeboth-Wilson Sustainability Coordinator Facilities Management |
Do the institution’s students have a representative body through which they can participate in governance (e.g. a student council)? :
Do the institution’s students have an elected representative on the institution’s highest governing body?:
A brief description of the bodies and mechanisms through which students are engaged in governance, including information to support each affirmative response above:
Campus-wide elections are held annual for Student Senate, our student governance body.
Student Senate is comprised of senators from each respective college. There are roughly fifteen (15) seats from each college. In addition, there are fifteen (15) Advocacy Senators. Advocacy Senators are students advocating on behalf of communities of students or matters affecting student life.
Do the institution’s staff members have a representative body through which they can participate in governance (e.g. a staff council)?:
Do the institution’s non-supervisory staff members have an elected representative on the institution’s highest governing body?:
A brief description of the bodies and mechanisms through which staff are engaged in governance, including information to support each affirmative response above:
Campus-wide elections are held annually for Academic Senate and University Staff Senate. All of campus staff (non-faculty) fit into one of these categories.
https://www.uwplatt.edu/academic-staff-senate
https://www.uwplatt.edu/governance/university-staff
Do the institution’s teaching and research faculty have a representative body through which they can participate in governance (e.g. a faculty senate)?:
Do the institution’s teaching and research faculty have an elected representative on the institution’s highest governing body? :
A brief description of the bodies and mechanisms through which teaching and research faculty are engaged in governance, including information to support each affirmative response above:
Campus-wide elections are held annually for Faculty Senate.
Does the institution have written policies and procedures to identify and engage external stakeholders (i.e. local residents) in land use planning, capital investment projects, and other institutional decisions that affect the community?:
A copy of the written policies and procedures:
The policies and procedures:
Does the institution have formal participatory or shared governance bodies through which community members representing the interests of the following stakeholder groups can regularly participate in institutional governance?:
Yes or No | |
Local government and/or educational organizations | No |
Private sector organizations | No |
Civil society (e.g. NGOs, NPOs) | No |
A brief description of the bodies and mechanisms through which external stakeholders are engaged in institutional governance (including information about each stakeholder group selected above):
The website URL where information about the programs or initiatives is available:
Additional documentation to support the submission:
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.