| Overall Rating | Silver - expired |
|---|---|
| Overall Score | 46.35 |
| Liaison | Alan Burr |
| Submission Date | March 2, 2018 |
| Executive Letter | Download |
University of Wisconsin-Platteville
OP-16: Student Commute Modal Split
| Status | Score | Responsible Party |
|---|---|---|
|
1.67 / 2.00 |
Amy
Seeboth-Wilson Sustainability Coordinator Facilities Management |
"---"
indicates that no data was submitted for this field
Total percentage of students (graduate and undergraduate) that use more sustainable commuting options as their primary means of transportation:
83.40
A brief description of the method(s) used to gather data about student commuting, including the timeframe for when the analysis was conducted and how a representative sample was reached, if applicable:
We completed an online survey of students in spring of 2017. The survey was administered to 3,379 students equally distributed across gender and enrollment year. Each student could only respond once and responses were kept anonymous (we could not connect responses to individuals). We had a response rate of 22.55%.
Optional Fields
| Percentage (0-100) | |
| Commute with only the driver in the vehicle (excluding motorcycles and scooters) | 16.60 |
| Walk, bicycle, or use other non-motorized means | 66.39 |
| Vanpool or carpool | 2.27 |
| Take a campus shuttle or public transportation | 1.27 |
| Use a motorcycle, scooter or moped | 0 |
The website URL where information about the programs or initiatives is available:
Additional documentation to support the submission:
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
To achieve the above numbers, we calculated the following:
Total percentage of students that use more sustainable commuting options as their primary means of transportation (0-100) = total minus students who always drive by themselves
All other modes are represented by "always" answer in survey.
Because we use the "always" response, our totals do not equal 100%- some respondents selected multiple "sometimes" and no "always"
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.