|Overall Rating||Gold - expired|
|Submission Date||Feb. 1, 2018|
OP-20: Construction and Demolition Waste Diversion
|0.83 / 1.00||
Construction and demolition materials recycled, donated, or otherwise recovered during the most recent year for which data is available within the previous three years:
Construction and demolition materials landfilled or incinerated during the most recent year for which data is available within the previous three years:
Percentage of construction and demolition materials diverted from the landfill or incinerator through recycling, donation and/or other forms of recovery:
A brief description of programs, policies, infrastructure investments, outreach efforts, and/or other factors that contributed to the diversion rate for construction and demolition waste:
All major construction projects at Western, including renovations to existing buildings, pursue minimum design standards. To date, we have used LEED as the main source of benchmark information, and our most recent construction projects have targeted and/or achieved certification under this program.
Under LEED v2009, construction projects are to ensure recycling stations are integrated throughout the project and are designed to support campus waste diversion goals and recycling programs.
Western has historically performed well in terms of LEED MRc2 Construction Waste Management, consistently achieving at least 75% diversion rates, and MRc4 Recycle Content consistently achieving at least 20% recycled content.
In addition, projects target 100% diversion of landscape waste, by weight, from landfill as per Western’s Grounds Management Plan.
The City of London does not permit the collection of wood waste, renovation materials and construction/demolition waste. The City’s EnviroDepots accept wood waste and renovation materials for recycling. The material is taken to a local Recycle Depot for processing, where approximately 80% is made into usable products.
The website URL where information about the programs or initiatives is available:
Additional documentation to support the submission:
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution and complete the Data Inquiry Form.