Overall Rating Gold
Overall Score 68.36
Liaison Patricia Huynh
Submission Date Dec. 10, 2024

STARS v2.2

University of Waterloo
OP-10: Biodiversity

Status Score Responsible Party
Complete 2.00 / 2.00 Patricia Huynh
Sustainability Projects Manager
Sustainability Office
"---" indicates that no data was submitted for this field

Does the institution own or manage land that includes or is adjacent to legally protected areas, internationally recognized areas, priority sites for biodiversity, or regions of conservation importance?:
Yes

A brief description of the legally protected areas, internationally recognized areas, priority sites for biodiversity, and/or regions of conservation importance:

Spongy Lake, owned by Waterloo, is Regional Municipality of Waterloo’s Environmentally Sensitive Policy Area (ESPA) #14. This designation restricts development within or near the future. Spongy Lake is protected for its geomorphological significance, hydrological processes, rare ericaceous vegetation, and the birds and insects found here. The kettle hole lake is a nutrient poor fen in early stages of bog succession.


Endangered and vulnerable species

Has the institution conducted an assessment to identify endangered and vulnerable species (including migratory species) with habitats on land owned or managed by the institution?:
Yes

A list of endangered and vulnerable species with habitats on land owned or managed by the institution, by level of extinction risk:

Bat detectors have been used to monitor bat species on campus. In 2023, a variety of species were detected:

  • Endangered: Eastern Red Bat, Hoary Bat, Eastern Red Bat, Little Brown Myotis, Silver-haired Bat

Monarch butterflies (endangered) have also been observed on campus: https://www.inaturalist.org/projects/university-of-waterloo

 


Areas of biodiversity importance

Has the institution conducted an assessment to identify areas of biodiversity importance on land owned or managed by the institution?:
Yes

A brief description of areas of biodiversity importance on land owned or managed by the institution:

Waterloo has a 270 acre environmental reserve which is dedicated to teaching and research as well as a community resource. It includes parkland, Conestoga Lake, and the Laurel Creek. The Laurel Creek also extends through the South Campus and has naturalized shoreline and supports a variety of wildlife before continuing through Waterloo Park.


Methodologies

If yes to either of the above, provide the following:

The methodologies used to identify endangered and vulnerable species and/or areas of biodiversity importance and any ongoing assessment and monitoring mechanisms:

As part of the Living Lab, a number of students were hired to conduct an inventory of all vegetative species on campus, so that assessments can be done of vulnerable and endangered species populations in order to identify remediation or support opportunities. These included natural areas, watershed areas, semi-natural areas, and managed areas.


A brief description of the scope of the assessment(s):

Includes all of main campus and north campus


A brief description of the plans or programs in place to protect or positively affect identified species, habitats, and/or ecosystems:

Waterloo has designated and manages an Environmental Reserve on its North Campus, a 270 acre area along the Laurel Creek and Conestoga Lake within the Grand River watershed with many naturalized areas and is used for study and research.

Waterloo has been recently managing garlic mustard and common buckthorn, and replacing these areas with native herbaceous plants, shrubs and trees.


Optional Fields

Estimated percentage of areas of biodiversity importance that are also protected areas :
---

Website URL where information about the institution’s biodiversity initiatives is available:
---

Additional documentation to support the submission:
---

Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
---

The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.