Overall Rating Gold
Overall Score 80.17
Liaison Mike Wilson
Submission Date May 5, 2020

STARS v2.2

University of Victoria
PA-4: Reporting Assurance

Status Score Responsible Party
Complete 1.00 / 1.00 Susan Kerr
Sustainability Coordinator
Office of Campus Planning and Sustainability
"---" indicates that no data was submitted for this field

Has the institution completed an assurance process that provides independent affirmation that the information in its current STARS report is reported in accordance with credit criteria?:
Yes

Did the assurance process include internal review, an external audit, or both?:
Internal review

The name, title, and organizational affiliation of each reviewer:

Susan Kerr, Sustainability Manager, Office of Campus Planning and Sustainability, University of Victoria.


A brief description of the institution’s assurance process:

After the completion of each credit within the STARS report, Susan Kerr reviewed all data sources, reported numbers, and descriptions to ensure accuracy and consistency in information across the entire report. During this review, she also ensured the report's compliance with the STARS Technical Manual and "common issues" identified in the provided STARS Review Template. Any issues that were identified were recorded and brought to the attention of Kay-Lynn Yacoboski to be addressed. After identified issues were addressed, the changes made were recorded, and sent back to Susan for a follow-up review. This process went on until all identified issues were resolved.


Affirmation from the reviewer(s) that the report has been reviewed in full and that all identified inconsistencies and errors have been successfully addressed prior to submitting it to AASH​E:
Completed STARS Review Template:
Affirmation from the reviewer(s) that the report has been reviewed in full and that all identified inconsistencies and errors have been successfully addressed prior to ​submitting it to AASHE (2nd review):
---

Completed STARS Review Template (2nd review):
---

Affirmation from the reviewer(s) that the report has been reviewed in full and that all identified inconsistencies and errors have been successfully addressed prior to ​submitting it to AASHE​ (3rd review):
---

Copy of completed STARS Review Template (3rd review):
---

Website URL where information about the institution’s reporting assurance is available:
---

Additional documentation to support the submission:
---

The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution and complete the Data Inquiry Form.