Overall Rating | Gold |
---|---|
Overall Score | 76.71 |
Liaison | Gioia Thompson |
Submission Date | Feb. 6, 2023 |
University of Vermont
OP-21: Water Use
Status | Score | Responsible Party |
---|---|---|
4.00 / 4.00 |
Gioia
Thompson Sustainability Strategist UVM Office of Sustainability |
"---"
indicates that no data was submitted for this field
Level of ”Physical Risk Quantity” for the institution’s main campus as indicated by the World Resources Institute Aqueduct Water Risk Atlas:
Low
Part 1. Reduction in potable water use per person
Performance Year | Baseline Year | |
Total water withdrawal | 128,513,821 Gallons | 182,337,013 Gallons |
Potable water use:
Performance Year | Baseline Year | |
Potable water use | 113,397,187 Gallons | 162,280,216 Gallons |
Start and end dates of the performance year and baseline year (or three-year periods):
Start Date | End Date | |
Performance Period | July 1, 2021 | June 30, 2022 |
Baseline Period | July 1, 2006 | June 30, 2007 |
If end date of the baseline year/period is 2004 or earlier, provide:
Used same baseline of FY07 and performance year of FY22 for all building-related performance measures. Period of 2007-2022 corresponded with significant changes to the campus, consistently measured data sets.
Figures needed to determine "Weighted Campus Users":
Performance Year | Baseline Year | |
Number of students resident on-site | 5,453 | 4,791 |
Number of employees resident on-site | 22 | 19 |
Number of other individuals resident on-site | 0 | 0 |
Total full-time equivalent student enrollment | 12,968.67 | 10,805 |
Full-time equivalent of employees | 3,443 | 3,437 |
Full-time equivalent of students enrolled exclusively in distance education | 190 | 2 |
Weighted campus users | 13,535.00 | 11,882.50 |
Potable water use per weighted campus user:
Performance Year | Baseline Year | |
Potable water use per weighted campus user | 8,378.07 Gallons | 13,657.08 Gallons |
Percentage reduction in potable water use per weighted campus user from baseline:
38.65
Part 2. Reduction in potable water use per unit of floor area
Performance Year | Baseline Year | |
Gross floor area | 6,053,508 Gross square feet | 5,250,510 Gross square feet |
Potable water use per unit of floor area:
Performance Year | Baseline Year | |
Potable water use per unit of floor area | 18.73 Gallons per square foot | 30.91 Gallons per square foot |
Percentage reduction in potable water use per unit of floor area from baseline:
39.39
Part 3. Reduction in total water withdrawal per unit of vegetated grounds
Performance Year | Baseline Year | |
Vegetated grounds | 4,162.28 Acres | 4,001 Acres |
Total water withdrawal per unit of vegetated grounds:
Performance Year | Baseline Year | |
Total water withdrawal per unit of vegetated grounds | 30,875.82 Gallons per acre | 45,572.86 Gallons per acre |
Percentage reduction in total water withdrawal per unit of vegetated grounds from baseline:
32.25
Optional Fields
Signage in residence halls reminding students not to leave water running. Signs in kitchens reminding staff to report leaks and drips.
A brief description of the institution's water recovery and reuse initiatives:
Recent upgrade of recovery system for steam condensate at the Central Heating & Cooling Plant.
A brief description of the institution's initiatives to replace plumbing fixtures, fittings, appliances, equipment, and systems with water-efficient alternatives:
Dining policy to thaw in fridge instead of under running water.
Website URL where information about the institution’s water conservation and efficiency efforts is available:
---
Additional documentation to support the submission:
---
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
Baseline year for vegetated grounds is FY14 because it is the closest year that we have data for.
As to how we determined potable vs non, we pulled any utilities flagged as just “water” into the potable category, whereas any identified as “water/sewer” were included in the total use. It is possible and likely that there is more potable water use than what is reflected in the figures, but we have no way of breaking it out with any greater degree of specificity.
As to how we determined potable vs non, we pulled any utilities flagged as just “water” into the potable category, whereas any identified as “water/sewer” were included in the total use. It is possible and likely that there is more potable water use than what is reflected in the figures, but we have no way of breaking it out with any greater degree of specificity.
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.