| Overall Rating | Gold - expired |
|---|---|
| Overall Score | 69.26 |
| Liaison | Gioia Thompson |
| Submission Date | March 1, 2017 |
| Executive Letter | Download |
University of Vermont
AC-7: Incentives for Developing Courses
| Status | Score | Responsible Party |
|---|---|---|
|
2.00 / 2.00 |
Wendy
Verrei-Berenback Assistant Director Center for Teaching and Learning |
Does the institution have an ongoing program or programs that offer incentives for faculty in multiple disciplines or departments to develop new sustainability courses and/or incorporate sustainability into existing courses?:
A brief description of the program(s), including positive outcomes during the previous three years (e.g. descriptions of new courses or course content resulting from the program):
Fellows attend four lunches, participate in the cornerstone two January Institute, and receive $250 each in professional development funds to support course design.
Fellows attend lunches early in the semester to help them get acquainted. These gatherings build community and set the foundation for strong collegial relationships during the cornerstone event, the two-day January Institute. Day one of the January Institute is held at Shelburne Farms with day two held on the UVM campus. The choice and timing of these locations is intentional. The quiet winter beauty of Shelburne Farms encourages personal reflection and connection to place, while day two on the UVM campus brings the fellows back to an academic environment. At Shelburne Farms, fellows explore the grounds, think through multiple perspectives and definitions of sustainability, apply systems thinking concepts, and consider the social justice implications of living in a sustainable world. They have time to engage in dialogue with peers and privately write in journals on the critical issues of sustainability.
Back at UVM participants focus on the working academic landscape. Fellows tackle course design to integrate sustainability concepts. They consider interdisciplinary collaborations and infuse information literacy skills when possible. Faculty and staff from curriculum and instruction programs are available to consult with the fellows. These include Writing in the Disciplines, Community-University Partnerships and Service Learning (CUPS), Library Instruction, and the Center for Teaching and Learning (CTL). By the end of the day, fellows are well on their way to developing a plan of action for course implementation. After the institute, conversations continue at two spring luncheons, held to provide support and report on final course designs.
Evaluation research about the SFF program was conducted. Overall, the evaluation’s findings suggest that UVM’s SFF program expanded faculty understanding of sustainability concepts, encouraged curricular and instructional reform, and made progress toward developing a community of faculty interested in sustainability education. The evaluation research was published in the following article:
Natkin, L.W. & Kolbe, T. (in press). Enhancing sustainability curriculum through faculty learning communities. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 17 (4).
The General Education requirement in Sustainability is a driver for the development of Sustainability courses. Under the University’s system of Incentive-Based Budgeting, the primary source of revenue to the academic units comes from tuition revenue as determined by Student Credit Hours taught (SCH). Because all undergraduate students must fulfill the Sustainability requirement, the academic units have an incentive to offer Sustainability courses, as these are a reliable source of income. Consequently, the academic units encourage their faculty to develop and teach approved (by the Faculty Senate’s Sustainability Curriculum and Review Committee) Sustainability courses as part of their regular workload.
Date Revised: May 22, 2017
A brief description of the incentives that faculty members who participate in the program(s) receive:
Fellows attend four lunches, participate in the cornerstone two January Institute, and receive $400 each in professional development funds to support course design.
Fellows attend lunches early in the semester to help them get acquainted. These gatherings build community and set the foundation for strong collegial relationships during the cornerstone event, the two-day January Institute. Day one of the January Institute is held at Shelburne Farms with day two held on the UVM campus. The choice and timing of these locations is intentional. The quiet winter beauty of Shelburne Farms encourages personal reflection and connection to place, while day two on the UVM campus brings the fellows back to an academic environment. At Shelburne Farms, fellows explore the grounds, think through multiple perspectives and definitions of sustainability, apply systems thinking concepts, and consider the social justice implications of living in a sustainable world. They have time to engage in dialogue with peers and privately write in journals on the critical issues of sustainability.
Back at UVM participants focus on the working academic landscape. Fellows tackle course design to integrate sustainability concepts. They consider interdisciplinary collaborations and infuse information literacy skills when possible. Faculty and staff from curriculum and instruction programs are available to consult with the fellows. These include Writing in the Disciplines, Community-University Partnerships and Service Learning (CUPS), Library Instruction, and the Center for Teaching and Learning (CTL). By the end of the day, fellows are well on their way to developing a plan of action for course implementation. After the institute, conversations continue at two spring luncheons, held to provide support and report on final course designs.
Evaluation research about the SFF program was conducted. Overall, the evaluation’s findings suggest that UVM’s SFF program expanded faculty understanding of sustainability concepts, encouraged curricular and instructional reform, and made progress toward developing a community of faculty interested in sustainability education. The evaluation research was published in the following article:
Natkin, L.W. & Kolbe, T. (in press). Enhancing sustainability curriculum through faculty learning communities. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 17 (4).
The General Education requirement in Sustainability is a driver for the development of Sustainability courses. Under the University’s system of Incentive-Based Budgeting, the primary source of revenue to the academic units comes from tuition revenue as determined by Student Credit Hours taught (SCH). Because all undergraduate students must fulfill the Sustainability requirement, the academic units have an incentive to offer Sustainability courses, as these are a reliable source of income. Consequently, the academic units encourage their faculty to develop and teach approved (by the Faculty Senate’s Sustainability Curriculum and Review Committee) Sustainability courses as part of their regular workload.
The website URL where information about the programs or initiatives is available:
Additional documentation to support the submission:
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
The performance year for this credit was FY 2016
The performance year for this credit was FY 2016
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.