Overall Rating Silver - expired
Overall Score 50.39
Liaison Marianella Franklin
Submission Date Aug. 28, 2015
Executive Letter Download

STARS v2.0

University of Texas Rio Grande Valley
OP-3: Building Operations and Maintenance

Status Score Responsible Party
Complete 0.90 / 4.00 Marta Salinas-Hovar
Asst Dir Project Planning and Management
Facilities Management
"---" indicates that no data was submitted for this field

None
Does the institution have any building space certified under the following green building rating systems for existing buildings?:
Yes or No
LEED for Existing Buildings or another 4-tier rating system used by an Established Green Building Council (GBC) No
The DGNB system, Green Star Performance, or another 3-tier GBC rating system No
BREEAM-In Use, CASBEE for Existing Building, or another 5-tier GBC rating system No
Other non-GBC rating systems (e.g. BOMA BESt, Green Globes) Yes

None
A brief description of the green building rating system(s) used and/or a list or sample of certified buildings and ratings:
Best practices : Impacts on the surrounding site Energy Consumption - Auto control of Building Building Level energy metering Usage of environmentally preferable materials Indoor environmental Quality Water consumption - Best Practice and Pm program Building - Level water metering - Building water meter . CMMS - (Automated ) Computerized maintenance system

None
Total floor area of eligible building space (operations and maintenance):
2,458,047 Square feet

None
Floor area of building space that is certified at each level under a 4-tier rating system for existing buildings used by an Established Green Building Council::
Certified Floor Area
Minimum Level (e.g. LEED Certified) 0 Square feet
3rd Highest Level (e.g. LEED Silver) 0 Square feet
2nd Highest Level (e.g. LEED Gold) 0 Square feet
Highest Achievable Level (e.g. LEED Platinum) 0 Square feet

None
Floor area of building space that is certified at each level under a 3-tier rating system for existing buildings used by an Established Green Building Council::
Certified Floor Area
Minimum Level 0 Square feet
Mid-Level 0 Square feet
Highest Achievable Level 0 Square feet

None
Floor area of building space that is certified at each level under a 5-tier rating system for existing buildings used by an Established Green Building Council::
Certified Floor Area
Minimum Level 0 Square feet
4th Highest Level 0 Square feet
Mid-Level 0 Square feet
2nd Highest Level 0 Square feet
Highest Achievable Level 0 Square feet

None
Floor area of building space that is certified at any level under other green building rating systems for existing buildings:
0 Square feet

None
Floor area of building space that is maintained in accordance with formally adopted sustainable building operations and maintenance guidelines or policies, but NOT certified:
1,474,828.20 Square feet

None
A copy of the sustainable building operations and maintenance guidelines or policies:
None
The date the guidelines or policies were formally adopted:
Aug. 20, 2009

None
A brief description of the sustainable building operations and maintenance program and/or a list or sample of buildings covered:
UTPA abides by the UT System Sustainability Policy. The Facilities Management department has a series of preventative maintenance (PM) schedules that are intended to focus on preserving the facilities at an optimal operating condition. The PM schedules consist of daily, weekly, monthly, quarterly, bi-annual and annual activities performed on equipment and building systems. These schedules are managed by a “computerized maintenance management system” (CMMS) that is known as WTMA (the Web based Maintenance Authority). These maintenance schedules not only assure that the building in operating effectively, but it also allows the equipment to run efficiently. For several years now, it has been our practice to incorporate the industries “best practices” into our everyday activities in order to maintain a respectable level of compliance with our university’s sustainability commitment. Some sustainable practices are also related to operating campus buildings on “occupied and un-occupied” modes which allows for energy conservation efforts. Other practice include re-lamping to more efficient lighting and replacing water fixtures to water saving devices.

None
A brief description of how the institution ensures compliance with sustainable building operation and maintenance guidelines and policies:
Each institution will update Energy Management Plans to reflect energy consumption reduction goals as of FY 2011 over the baseline levels established by the Energy Utility Task Force in 2001. The institutions will report quarterly progress to their Energy Management Plans by means of Governor’s Executive Order RP-49. Any new capital or major renovation project will apply, as a minimum, the energy efficiency design and construction principles of the American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers (ASHRAE) Standard 90.1 as established by the State Energy Conservation Office (SECO). The institution planning and design process will include consideration of life cycle cost along with other factors in the project planning and design process, recognizing the importance of long-term operations, maintenance, total cost of ownership of U. T. System facilities, budgetary constraints, and programmatic requirements. A measurement and verification plan will be prepared prior to the completion of construction of a new building or major renovation, directed toward establishing an energy service consumption baseline during the first 12 months of occupancy. Subsequent energy consumption audits every three years will document 20% variances to the baseline levels. Institutions will require rainwater and gray water harvesting systems for non-potable use for new buildings where practical and within program budgets. High Performance Buildings. Each institution will strive to achieve a high performance building comparable to a U.S. Green Building Council Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (“LEED®”) Certified rating or higher whenever possible, excluding laboratory and acute care and patient care facilities, within the constraints of program needs and budget parameters. U. T. System recognizes and commends the early leadership and accomplishments of LEED® as a green building certification program; however, that certification currently comes with a significant cost in documentation. Therefore, U. T. System strives for a high-performance building standard comparable to LEED® for new major capital projects. Money for certification documentation is better spent obtaining more energy-efficient building systems. Further study will be conducted before similar sustainable design policies for laboratory and acute care and/or patient care facilities are adopted.

None
The website URL where information about the institution’s certified buildings and/or sustainable operations and maintenance guidelines or policies is available:
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
---

The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.