Overall Rating Gold
Overall Score 69.72
Liaison Jim Walker
Submission Date June 6, 2022

STARS v2.2

University of Texas at Austin
OP-22: Rainwater Management

Status Score Responsible Party
Complete 2.00 / 2.00 John Salsman
Director
Environmental Health & Safety
"---" indicates that no data was submitted for this field

Which of the following best describes the institution’s approach to rainwater management?:
Comprehensive policies, plans or guidelines that require LID practices for all new projects

A brief description of the institution’s green infrastructure and LID practices:

Excerpt from Campus Design Standard for Storm Water Management

"Basis for Design Requirements
The University of Texas (UT) holds a Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) Permit which requires UT to do the following:
 Limit the increase in erosion and discharge of pollutants in stormwater as a result of new development or re-development
 Implement a comprehensive master planning process to include all new development and re-development
 Provide resources for the long term maintenance and operation of the best
management practices Design Parameters

The following are design and construction parameters that help meet the required objectives. These are pre-requisites from the Sustainable Sites Initiative (SITES) Version 2. Designs for stormwater management must be implemented and must meet these requirements."


A copy of the institution’s rainwater management policy, plan, and/or guidelines:
A brief description of the institution’s rainwater management policy, plan, and/or guidelines that supports the responses above:

UT Austin is expanding stormwater pollution control standards and strategies during construction into a campus-wide approach to stormwater management, which includes incorporating cisterns and bioswales and other LID strategies.


Website URL where information about the institution’s green infrastructure and LID practices is available:
Additional documentation to support the submission:
---

Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
---

The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.