University of Texas at Austin
OP-11: Sustainable Procurement
Status | Score | Responsible Party |
---|---|---|
3.00 / 3.00 |
Marcus
Grimes Associate Director, Procurement and Warehousing Business and Financial Services |
Part 1. Institution-wide sustainable procurement policies
A copy of the policies, guidelines or directives:
The policies, guidelines or directives:
Part 2. Life Cycle Cost Analysis
Which of the following best describes the institution’s use of LCCA?:
A brief description of the LCCA policy and/or practices:
"Energy and Environment" link at bottom of page
https://pmcservices.utexas.edu/design-construction-standards/dc-standards-division-01-general-requirements
The University has committed to approaching new building construction and major renovations with an emphasis on Life Cycle Cost (LCC). Part of this approach is a focus on maximizing energy efficiency and providing cost effective sustainable design. This approach to energy efficiency and cost effective sustainable design begins at the project conception and continues throughout the construction and operating life of the building. These design standards approach this issue of energy and environment on multiple levels during project design process. The first goal is that the project meets minimum requirements set by the Energy Conservation Design Standard for New State Buildings, meaning that for the majority of campus facilities (all non-residential facilities) the minimum requirements set forth in current adopted version ASHRAE 90.1 are met, and all supporting documentation is completed and provided for approval in conjunction with the Texas Design Standard Compliance Form as required by the State Energy Conservation Office. In additional to meeting ASHRAE 90.1, an alternative energy feasibility assessment shall be conducted. This requirement is outlined by Section 2166.403, Title 10, of the Texas Government Code which requires that a governing body undertaking construction of a new state building verify the economic feasibility of incorporating into the building’s design alternative energy devices for space heating and cooling, water heating, electrical loads, and interior lighting.
Part 3. Product-specific sustainability criteria
To count, the criteria must address the specific sustainability challenges and impacts associated with products and/or services in each category, e.g. by requiring or giving preference to multi-criteria sustainability standards, certifications and labels appropriate to the category. Broader, institution-wide policies should be reported in Part 1, above.
Chemically intensive products and services
A brief description of the published sustainability criteria for chemically intensive products and services:
The (OS1) program focuses on both the health of the building occupants and the cleaning staff. Environmentally preferable cleaning strategies, procedures, training, and purchasing guidelines for consumables, tools and equipment are all part of responsible cleaning. All of the daily-use cleaning chemicals prescribed in the (OS1) Program have earned the Green Seal Certification or are EPA registered disinfectants.
https://facilitiesservices.utexas.edu/divisions/custodial/cleaning-program
Consumable office products
A brief description of the published sustainability criteria for consumable office products:
Avoid products that are bleached or processed with chlorine or chlorine derivatives
Batteries: NiMH or Lithium rechargeable batteries
Avoid batteries containing Mercury (Hg), Cadmium (Cd) or Lead (Pb)
Copiers & printers: Uses a low melting point toner; Remanufactured or refillable cartridges
Adhesive: Nontoxic, water-soluble adhesive and paper or cellulose based tapes
Avoid spray adhesives
Binders and Filing: Recycled content
Copiers and Printers: Compatible with recycled and remanufactured products
Uses a low melting point toner
Multifunctional capability to save space and resources
Stand-by or power down functionality
ENERGY STAR certified
Ability to print double-sided
https://financials.utexas.edu/hbp/part-7/12-3-commodity-specific-recommendations
Furniture and furnishings
A brief description of the published sustainability criteria for furniture and furnishings:
Low or no VOC-emitting
High percentage postconsumer recycled materials
FSC and PEFC certified wood products
Natural latex foam, avoid plastic foams that contain CFCs , HCFCs, or polyurethane
Domestic soft wood (e.g., pine) instead of tropical hardwoods (e.g., mahogany)
Solvent and formaldehyde free finishes and glue
New furniture purchases to meet LEED certification requirements. Options for meeting LEED requirements include Standard 4.5EQ (Indoor Air Quality), 2.3MR (Resource Reuse) and 5.1/5.2MR (Regional Materials). Furniture meeting 4.5EQ (Indoor Air Quality) should be GreenGuard Certified.
Emphasized in Division 12 Campus Standards https://utexas.app.box.com/s/zh5fby0jthbcwz0b2tyvs4ftfi1br15a
Information Technology (IT) and equipment
A brief description of the published sustainability criteria for Information Technology (IT) and equipment:
Avoid batteries containing Mercury (Hg), Cadmium (Cd) or Lead (Pb)
Computers and Monitors: Electronic Product Environmental Assessment Tool (EPEAT) environmental certification, gold level preferred
https://financials.utexas.edu/hbp/part-7/12-3-commodity-specific-recommendations
Food service providers
A brief description of the published sustainability criteria for food service providers:
Garments and linens
A brief description of the published sustainability criteria for garments and linens:
Professional service providers
A brief description of the published sustainability criteria for professional service providers:
The statewide HUB goals for the procurement categories for the State of Texas are:
11.2% for heavy construction other than building contracts;
21.1% for all building construction, including general contractors and operative builders' contracts;
32.9% for all special trade construction contracts;
23.7% for professional services contracts;
26.0% for all other services contracts; and
21.1% for commodities contracts.
https://financials.utexas.edu/hub/hub-goals
https://comptroller.texas.gov/purchasing/vendor/hub/
Transportation and fuels
A brief description of the published sustainability criteria for transportation and fuels:
However, due to the expense associated with training, providing necessary support equipment, and stocking various types of fuel, University Fleet Operations recommends departments limit their choice of fuel types. The three preferred alternative fuels are E85 and propane (LPG) for vehicles usually powered by gasoline, and biodiesel B20 for diesel trucks.
https://parking.utexas.edu/fleet/fuels/alternative
Optional Fields
Additional documentation to support the submission:
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.