Overall Rating | Gold - expired |
---|---|
Overall Score | 65.58 |
Liaison | Jim Walker |
Submission Date | March 2, 2020 |
University of Texas at Austin
OP-16: Commute Modal Split
Status | Score | Responsible Party |
---|---|---|
3.50 / 5.00 |
Blanca
Gamez Director Parking and Transportation Services |
"---"
indicates that no data was submitted for this field
Total full-time equivalent student enrollment:
47,296
Full-time equivalent of employees:
12,189
Part 1. Student commute modal split
Yes
Total percentage of students that use more sustainable commuting options as their primary mode of transportation:
71.88
A brief description of the method(s) used to gather data about student commuting:
Using data from a survey administered during the 2016-2017 academic year, Parking and Transportation Services at UT Austin gathered data about student commuting. Survey data focused primarily on bicycling habits of UT Austin campus members, but also provided details on common mode of transportation.
Part 2. Employee commute modal split
Yes
Total percentage of employees that use more sustainable commuting options as their primary mode of transportation:
62.91
A brief description of the method(s) used to gather data about employee commuting:
Using data from a survey administered during the 2016-2017 academic year, Parking and Transportation Services at UT Austin gathered data about employee commuting. Survey data focused primarily on bicycling habits of UT Austin campus members, but also provided details on common mode of transportation.
Optional Fields
Percentage of students (0-100) | Percentage of employees (0-100) | |
Single-occupancy vehicle | 7.29 | 28.18 |
Zero-emissions vehicle | 0 | 0 |
Walk, cycle, or other non-motorized mode | 62.50 | 41.09 |
Vanpool or carpool | 0 | 7.27 |
Public transport or campus shuttle | 9.38 | 13.64 |
Motorcycle, motorized scooter/bike, or moped | 0 | 0.91 |
Distance education / telecommute | 0 | 0 |
Website URL where information about student or employee commuting is available:
Additional documentation to support the submission:
---
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
.
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.