Overall Rating | Silver - expired |
---|---|
Overall Score | 61.37 |
Liaison | Jay Price |
Submission Date | April 3, 2017 |
Executive Letter | Download |
University of Tennessee at Knoxville
OP-1: Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Status | Score | Responsible Party |
---|---|---|
8.24 / 10.00 |
Preston
Jacobsen Sustainability Manager Facilities Services |
Part 1
Does the institution’s GHG emissions inventory include all, some or none of its Scope 3 GHG emissions from the following categories?:
All, Some, or None | |
Business travel | All |
Commuting | All |
Purchased goods and services | Some |
Capital goods | Some |
Waste generated in operations | All |
Fuel- and energy-related activities not included in Scope 1 or Scope 2 | Some |
Other categories | Some |
A copy of the most recent GHG emissions inventory:
A brief description of the methodology and/or tool used to complete the GHG emissions inventory, including how the institution accounted for each category of Scope 3 emissions reported above:
Has the GHG emissions inventory been validated internally by personnel who are independent of the GHG accounting and reporting process and/or verified by an independent, external third party?:
A brief description of the internal and/or external verification process:
Documentation to support the internal and/or external verification process:
Does the institution wish to pursue Part 2 and Part 3 of this credit? (reductions in Scope 1 and Scope 2 GHG emissions):
Part 2
Performance Year | Baseline Year | |
Gross Scope 1 GHG emissions from stationary combustion | 63,429 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent | 61,186 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent |
Gross Scope 1 GHG emissions from other sources | 7,432 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent | 7,436 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent |
Gross Scope 2 GHG emissions from purchased electricity | 142,213 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent | 173,384 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent |
Gross Scope 2 GHG emissions from other sources | 0 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent | 0 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent |
Total | 213,074 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent | 242,006 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent |
Start and end dates of the performance year and baseline year (or three-year periods):
Start Date | End Date | |
Performance Year | July 1, 2015 | June 30, 2016 |
Baseline Year | July 1, 2007 | June 30, 2008 |
A brief description of when and why the GHG emissions baseline was adopted (e.g. in sustainability plans and policies or in the context of other reporting obligations):
Figures needed to determine total carbon offsets:
Performance Year | Baseline Year | |
Third-party verified carbon offsets purchased (exclude purchased RECs/GOs) | 0 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent | 0 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent |
Institution-catalyzed carbon offsets generated | 0 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent | 0 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent |
Carbon sequestration due to land that the institution manages specifically for sequestration | 0 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent | 1 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent |
Carbon storage from on-site composting | 302 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent | 38 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent |
Carbon offsets included above for which the emissions reductions have been sold or transferred by the institution | 0 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent | 0 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent |
Net carbon offsets | 302 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent | 39 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent |
If total performance year carbon offsets are greater than zero, provide:
The reporting fields in the table below are reserved for institutions that have NOT already accounted for renewable energy purchases (including RECs and GOs) in their Scope 2 GHG emissions calculations. Other institutions - including all SIMAP users - should report zero ('0') to avoid double-counting.
Performance Year | Baseline Year | |
Emissions reductions attributable to REC/GO purchases | 150,038 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent | 4,430 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent |
A brief description of the purchased RECs/GOs including vendor, project source and verification program:
Adjusted net Scope 1 and 2 GHG emissions:
Performance Year | Baseline Year | |
Adjusted net Scope 1 and 2 GHG emissions | 70,559 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent | 237,537 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent |
Figures needed to determine “Weighted Campus Users”:
Performance Year | Baseline Year | |
Number of students resident on-site | 8,739 | 8,132 |
Number of employees resident on-site | 11 | 0 |
Number of other individuals resident on-site and/or staffed hospital beds | 609 | 0 |
Total full-time equivalent student enrollment | 25,726.70 | 24,998.80 |
Full-time equivalent of employees (staff + faculty) | 7,245.90 | 7,986 |
Full-time equivalent of students enrolled exclusively in distance education | 140 | 0 |
Weighted campus users | 27,420.95 | 26,771.60 |
Adjusted net Scope 1 and 2 GHG emissions per weighted campus user:
Performance Year | Baseline Year | |
Adjusted net Scope 1 and 2 GHG emissions per weighted campus user | 2.57 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent | 8.87 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent |
Percentage reduction in adjusted net Scope 1 and Scope 2 GHG emissions per weighted campus user from baseline:
Part 3
Floor area of energy intensive building space, performance year:
Floor Area | |
Laboratory space | 993,018 Square feet |
Healthcare space | 114,681 Square feet |
Other energy intensive space | 214,680 Square feet |
EUI-adjusted floor area, performance year:
Adjusted net Scope 1 and 2 GHG emissions per unit of EUI-adjusted floor area, performance year:
Optional Fields
Emissions | |
Business travel | 14,237 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent |
Commuting | 27,707 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent |
Purchased goods and services | 1,026 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent |
Capital goods | --- |
Fuel- and energy-related activities not included in Scope 1 or Scope 2 | 14,358 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent |
Waste generated in operations | 6,132 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent |
Other categories | 5,023 Metric tons of CO2 equivalent |
A brief description of the institution’s GHG emissions reduction initiatives, including efforts made during the previous three years:
The website URL where information about the programs or initiatives is available:
Additional documentation to support the submission:
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.