| Overall Rating | Gold |
|---|---|
| Overall Score | 73.80 |
| Liaison | Corey Peterson |
| Submission Date | June 2, 2022 |
University of Tasmania
PA-4: Reporting Assurance
| Status | Score | Responsible Party |
|---|---|---|
|
1.00 / 1.00 |
Sustainability
Team UTAS Infrastructure Services and Development |
Has the institution completed an assurance process that provides independent affirmation that the information in its current STARS report is reported in accordance with credit criteria?:
Did the assurance process include internal review, an external audit, or both?:
The name, title, and organizational affiliation of each reviewer:
Suzanne Davis, Principal Sustainability Officer, The University of Queensland
Helena Malawkin, Program Manager - Environment & Sustainability, The University of Queensland
Christine McCallum, Principal Program Officer - Sustainability, The University of Queensland
Warren Mortlock, Program Officer, The University of Queensland
Cassidy Mogg, Sustainability Engagement Officer, The University of Queensland
A brief description of the institution’s assurance process:
As part of the ACTS (Australasian Campuses Towards Sustainability) pilot cohort, participants engaged in peer-review for another participant university. The reviewer used the Review Template provided by AASHE to identify problems/inconsistencies and to communicate them to the University of Tasmania Sustainability Team. The Sustainability Team then addressed each of them in the submission and in the template.
Affirmation from the reviewer(s) that the report has been reviewed in full and that all identified inconsistencies and errors have been successfully addressed prior to submitting it to AASHE:
Completed STARS Review Template:
Affirmation from the reviewer(s) that the report has been reviewed in full and that all identified inconsistencies and errors have been successfully addressed prior to submitting it to AASHE (2nd review):
Completed STARS Review Template (2nd review):
Affirmation from the reviewer(s) that the report has been reviewed in full and that all identified inconsistencies and errors have been successfully addressed prior to submitting it to AASHE (3rd review):
Copy of completed STARS Review Template (3rd review):
Website URL where information about the institution’s reporting assurance is available:
Additional documentation to support the submission:
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.