Overall Rating | Gold |
---|---|
Overall Score | 73.80 |
Liaison | Corey Peterson |
Submission Date | June 2, 2022 |
University of Tasmania
OP-21: Water Use
Status | Score | Responsible Party |
---|---|---|
1.27 / 4.00 |
Sustainability
Team UTAS Infrastructure Services and Development |
"---"
indicates that no data was submitted for this field
Level of ”Physical Risk Quantity” for the institution’s main campus as indicated by the World Resources Institute Aqueduct Water Risk Atlas:
Low
Part 1. Reduction in potable water use per person
Performance Year | Baseline Year | |
Total water withdrawal | 231,525 Cubic meters | 230,572.10 Cubic meters |
Potable water use:
Performance Year | Baseline Year | |
Potable water use | 229,108 Cubic meters | 227,073.25 Cubic meters |
Start and end dates of the performance year and baseline year (or three-year periods):
Start Date | End Date | |
Performance Period | Jan. 1, 2021 | Dec. 31, 2021 |
Baseline Period | Jan. 1, 2015 | Dec. 31, 2015 |
If end date of the baseline year/period is 2004 or earlier, provide:
---
Figures needed to determine "Weighted Campus Users":
Performance Year | Baseline Year | |
Number of students resident on-site | 1,241 | 908.58 |
Number of employees resident on-site | 0 | 0.67 |
Number of other individuals resident on-site | 0 | 0.58 |
Total full-time equivalent student enrollment | 17,659 | 15,500.97 |
Full-time equivalent of employees | 2,895 | 2,743.76 |
Full-time equivalent of students enrolled exclusively in distance education | 6,216 | 3,648.29 |
Weighted campus users | 11,063.75 | 11,175.22 |
Potable water use per weighted campus user:
Performance Year | Baseline Year | |
Potable water use per weighted campus user | 20.71 Cubic meters | 20.32 Cubic meters |
Percentage reduction in potable water use per weighted campus user from baseline:
0
Part 2. Reduction in potable water use per unit of floor area
Performance Year | Baseline Year | |
Gross floor area | 420,914 Gross square meters | 301,177 Gross square meters |
Potable water use per unit of floor area:
Performance Year | Baseline Year | |
Potable water use per unit of floor area | 0.54 Cubic meters per square meter | 0.75 Cubic meters per square meter |
Percentage reduction in potable water use per unit of floor area from baseline:
27.81
Part 3. Reduction in total water withdrawal per unit of vegetated grounds
Performance Year | Baseline Year | |
Vegetated grounds | 120.69 Hectares | 119.25 Hectares |
Total water withdrawal per unit of vegetated grounds:
Performance Year | Baseline Year | |
Total water withdrawal per unit of vegetated grounds | 1,918.35 Cubic meters per hectare | 1,933.52 Cubic meters per hectare |
Percentage reduction in total water withdrawal per unit of vegetated grounds from baseline:
0.78
Optional Fields
Water conservation poster developed and displayed regularly in several locations per campus.
A brief description of the institution's water recovery and reuse initiatives:
Several rainwater tanks across the three Tasmanian campuses.
The Australian Maritime College cavitation tunnel tanks are use for demineralisation and storage of water for reuse in the cavitation tunnel experiments.
The Australian Maritime College cavitation tunnel tanks are use for demineralisation and storage of water for reuse in the cavitation tunnel experiments.
A brief description of the institution's initiatives to replace plumbing fixtures, fittings, appliances, equipment, and systems with water-efficient alternatives:
UTAS has water efficiency infrastructure currently in place across its three campuses, such as dual-flush toilets and low flush urinals in many buildings (not yet across the board) and has been installing water efficient fittings in all new buildings since 2009. Over the coming years, it is envisaged that water efficiency will continue to improve through infrastructure upgrades and behaviour change initiatives
Website URL where information about the institution’s water conservation and efficiency efforts is available:
Additional documentation to support the submission:
---
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
Reticulated water and water from rivers data comes from invoices and submeters. Rainwater data was estimated based on water tanks capacity.
Note that there has been a significant increase in gross floor area of building space because of the current Transformation Programs at UTAS. The University is well-advanced on a major transformation that involves the relocation of Tasmanian campuses to the three major regional cities as well as major building upgrades to our Sydney campus. The transformation involves an increase in construction and acquisition of buildings, while maintaining former buildings until the programs are completed.
Area of vegetated grounds was estimated using GIS and provided by the University's Contracted Services Administrator (Grounds and Maintenance).
Note that there has been a significant increase in gross floor area of building space because of the current Transformation Programs at UTAS. The University is well-advanced on a major transformation that involves the relocation of Tasmanian campuses to the three major regional cities as well as major building upgrades to our Sydney campus. The transformation involves an increase in construction and acquisition of buildings, while maintaining former buildings until the programs are completed.
Area of vegetated grounds was estimated using GIS and provided by the University's Contracted Services Administrator (Grounds and Maintenance).
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.