Overall Rating | Silver - expired |
---|---|
Overall Score | 50.94 |
Liaison | Corey Peterson |
Submission Date | July 15, 2020 |
University of Tasmania
OP-18: Waste Minimization and Diversion
Status | Score | Responsible Party |
---|---|---|
2.14 / 8.00 |
Sustainability
Team UTAS Infrastructure Services and Development |
"---"
indicates that no data was submitted for this field
Parts 1 and 2. Waste per person
Performance Year | Baseline Year | |
Materials recycled | 174 Metric tons | 193 Metric tons |
Materials composted | 0 Metric tons | 0 Metric tons |
Materials donated or re-sold | 9 Metric tons | 4 Metric tons |
Materials disposed through post-recycling residual conversion | 0 Metric tons | 0 Metric tons |
Materials disposed in a solid waste landfill or incinerator | 1,562 Metric tons | 1,182 Metric tons |
Total waste generated | 1,745 Metric tons | 1,379 Metric tons |
If reporting post-recycling residual conversion, provide:
---
Start and end dates of the performance year and baseline year (or three-year periods):
Start Date | End Date | |
Performance Period | Jan. 1, 2018 | Dec. 31, 2018 |
Baseline Period | Jan. 1, 2015 | Dec. 31, 2015 |
If end date of the baseline year/period is 2004 or earlier, provide:
---
Figures needed to determine "Weighted Campus Users”:
Performance Year | Baseline Year | |
Number of students resident on-site | 1,454.33 | 908.58 |
Number of employees resident on-site | 0.50 | 0.67 |
Number of other individuals resident on-site | 0.64 | 0.58 |
Total full-time equivalent student enrollment | 16,720.95 | 15,500.97 |
Full-time equivalent of employees | 2,892.40 | 2,743.76 |
Full-time equivalent of students enrolled exclusively in distance education | 5,116.85 | 3,648.29 |
Weighted campus users | 11,236.72 | 11,175.22 |
Total waste generated per weighted campus user:
Performance Year | Baseline Year | |
Total waste generated per weighted campus user | 0.16 Metric tons | 0.12 Metric tons |
Percentage reduction in total waste generated per weighted campus user from baseline:
0
Part 3. Waste diverted from the landfill or incinerator
10.49
Percentage of materials diverted from the landfill or incinerator (including up to 10 percent attributable to post-recycling residual conversion):
10.49
In the waste figures reported above, has the institution recycled, composted, donated and/or re-sold the following materials?:
Yes or No | |
Paper, plastics, glass, metals, and other recyclable containers | Yes |
Food | No |
Cooking oil | No |
Plant materials | No |
Animal bedding | No |
White goods (i.e. appliances) | No |
Electronics | Yes |
Laboratory equipment | No |
Furniture | Yes |
Residence hall move-in/move-out waste | No |
Scrap metal | No |
Pallets | No |
Tires | No |
Other (please specify below) | Yes |
A brief description of other materials the institution has recycled, composted, donated and/or re-sold:
The University's provider also collects and recycles sawdust
Optional Fields
Active Recovery and Reuse
---
Recycling Management
Yes
Does the institution use dual stream recycling to collect standard recyclables in common areas?:
Yes
Does the institution use multi-stream recycling to collect standard recyclables in common areas?:
No
Contamination and Discard Rates
---
A brief description of any recycling quality control mechanisms employed:
---
Programs and Initiatives
- Waste reduction posters (procurement and recycling) developed and displayed regularly in several locations per campus.
- University specific signage in waste and recycling bins.
- Falling Trash student competition run in 2017 and 2018. Students downloaded the Falling Trash game app and play to compete for the top three scores to win a prize
- University specific signage in waste and recycling bins.
- Falling Trash student competition run in 2017 and 2018. Students downloaded the Falling Trash game app and play to compete for the top three scores to win a prize
A brief description of the institution's waste audits and other initiatives to assess its materials management efforts and identify areas for improvement:
---
A brief description of the institution's procurement policies designed to prevent waste:
A University Circular Economy Strategic Plan in currently being developed and will be made publicly available when finalised. This strategic plan will guide the entire University community in achieving our resource recovery and waste minimisation objectives using waste hierarchy in all university operations and activities
A brief description of the institution's surplus department or formal office supplies exchange program that facilitates reuse of materials:
---
A brief description of the institution's platforms to encourage peer-to-peer exchange and reuse:
The Tasmania University Union manages a reuse centre in Newnham campus, where staff and students can leave unwanted items or take items they need
A brief description of the institution's limits on paper and ink consumption:
---
A brief description of the institution's initiatives to make materials available online by default rather than printing them:
All course guides, unit information, directories, etc. are available online. Some materials are printed for specific events (e.g., Open Day)
A brief description of the institution's program to reduce residence hall move-in/move-out waste:
Accommodation Services organises end of year clean ups where unwanted items are stored, donated or recycled
A brief description of the institution's programs or initiatives to recover and reuse other materials intended for disposal:
The University's furniture Re-Use Program (https://www.utas.edu.au/infrastructure-services-development/sustainability/recycling-and-waste-management/re-use-program) allows staff to:
- List unwanted furniture that are suitable for re-use within the University
- View and search an online catalogue of furniture
- Claim or request an item
- List unwanted furniture that are suitable for re-use within the University
- View and search an online catalogue of furniture
- Claim or request an item
Website URL where information about the institution’s waste minimization and diversion efforts is available:
Additional documentation to support the submission:
---
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
---
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.