| Overall Rating | Silver - expired |
|---|---|
| Overall Score | 50.94 |
| Liaison | Corey Peterson |
| Submission Date | July 15, 2020 |
University of Tasmania
OP-12: Electronics Purchasing
| Status | Score | Responsible Party |
|---|---|---|
|
0.56 / 1.00 |
Sustainability
Team UTAS Infrastructure Services and Development |
Total annual expenditures on electronics:
Expenditures on environmentally or socially preferable electronics:
| Expenditure Per Level | |
| EPEAT Gold registered and/or third party certified at the highest achievable level under a multi-attribute sustainability standard | 0 US/Canadian $ |
| EPEAT Silver registered and/or third party certified at mid-level under a multi-attribute sustainability standard | 3,541,213.75 US/Canadian $ |
| EPEAT Bronze registered and/or third party certified at minimum level under a multi-attribute sustainability standard | 708,242.75 US/Canadian $ |
| Labeled under a single-attribute standard | 0 US/Canadian $ |
Do the figures reported above include leased equipment?:
A brief description of the time period from which the figures reported above are drawn:
2019 calendar year
Website URL where information about the institution’s electronics purchasing is available:
Additional documentation to support the submission:
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
Expense per product data has been provided by ITC department.
Expenditure per EPEAT rating has been estimated based on the percentage of Dell products by category that are relevant to the University, where 83% had a silver rating and 17% had a bronze rating. A more detailed screening would be onerous because of the nature of the data, where product description is not a standard field.
Expense per product data has been provided by ITC department.
Expenditure per EPEAT rating has been estimated based on the percentage of Dell products by category that are relevant to the University, where 83% had a silver rating and 17% had a bronze rating. A more detailed screening would be onerous because of the nature of the data, where product description is not a standard field.
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.