Overall Rating | Silver - expired |
---|---|
Overall Score | 49.23 |
Liaison | Maria Dahmus |
Submission Date | June 21, 2018 |
Executive Letter | Download |
University of St. Thomas
AC-11: Open Access to Research
Status | Score | Responsible Party |
---|---|---|
0.00 / 2.00 |
Meg
Manahan Associate Director for Collection Management & Services University of St. Thomas Libraries |
"---"
indicates that no data was submitted for this field
How many of the institution’s research-producing divisions are covered by a published open access policy that ensures that versions of future scholarly articles by faculty and staff are deposited in a designated open access repository? (All, Some or None):
None / Don't Know
Which of the following best describes the open access policy? (Mandatory or Voluntary):
Voluntary (strictly opt-in)
Does the institution provide financial incentives to support faculty members with article processing and other open access publication charges?:
No
A brief description of the open access policy, including the date adopted, any incentives or supports provided, and the repository(ies) used:
The university libraries provide support and assistance in loading articles into the university's open-access repository
A copy of the institution's open access policy:
---
The institution's open access policy:
The university does not have a formally adopted open-access policy, though we do have an open access repository.
None
The website URL where the open access repository is available:
Optional Fields
4
A brief description of how the institution’s library(ies) support open access to research:
The open access repository is funded and supported by the libraries. The libraries have a library guide on Open Educational Resources which includes information about open access to research. The library liaisons consult with faculty on their research and on open access publishing options. Our discovery layer offers access to open access repositories.
The website URL where information about the programs or initiatives is available:
Additional documentation to support the submission:
---
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
---
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.