Overall Rating | Silver - expired |
---|---|
Overall Score | 53.46 |
Liaison | Winnie Mulamba |
Submission Date | March 13, 2017 |
Executive Letter | Download |
University of South Florida St. Petersburg
OP-19: Waste Minimization and Diversion
Status | Score | Responsible Party |
---|---|---|
1.76 / 8.00 |
Brian
Pullen Sustainability Planner Facilities Services |
"---"
indicates that no data was submitted for this field
Parts 1 and 2: Waste Minimization
Performance Year | Baseline Year | |
Materials recycled | 115.46 Tons | 64 Tons |
Materials composted | 4.39 Tons | 4.39 Tons |
Materials donated or re-sold | 0 Tons | 0 Tons |
Materials disposed through post-recycling residual conversion | 0 Tons | 0 Tons |
Materials disposed in a solid waste landfill or incinerator | 661.80 Tons | 705 Tons |
Total waste generated | 781.65 Tons | 773.39 Tons |
If reporting post-recycling residual conversion, provide:
---
Start and end dates of the performance year and baseline year (or three-year periods):
Start Date | End Date | |
Performance Year | July 1, 2015 | June 30, 2016 |
Baseline Year | Jan. 1, 2014 | Dec. 31, 2014 |
If end date of the baseline year/period is 2004 or earlier, provide:
Since we signed the ACUPCC, we conduct a bi-yearly GHG inventory. Thus, we collected waste data for a total of six weeks by checking dumpsters- what's being thrown away, how full the dumpsters are before being picked up, etc. (Same with our recycling streams) Weight calculations are implemented using a formula chart found attached below. Emissions associated with waste disposal were included in the inventory. USFSP compiled a baseline report of waste management for 2014.
Figures needed to determine "Weighted Campus Users”:
Performance Year | Baseline Year | |
Number of students resident on-site | 469.67 | 384 |
Number of employees resident on-site | 14.67 | 15 |
Number of other individuals resident on-site and/or staffed hospital beds | 0 | 0 |
Total full-time equivalent student enrollment | 4,080.12 | 4,260.18 |
Full-time equivalent of employees (staff + faculty) | 690.95 | 648.65 |
Full-time equivalent of students enrolled exclusively in distance education | 1,005 | 1,029 |
Weighted campus users | 2,945.64 | 3,009.62 |
Total waste generated per weighted campus user:
Performance Year | Baseline Year | |
Total waste generated per weighted campus user | 0.27 Tons | 0.26 Tons |
Percentage reduction in total waste generated per weighted campus user from baseline:
0
Part 3: Waste Diversion
15.33
Percentage of materials diverted from the landfill or incinerator (including up to 10 percent attributable to post-recycling residual conversion):
15.33
In the waste figures reported above, has the institution recycled, composted, donated and/or re-sold the following materials?:
Yes or No | |
Paper, plastics, glass, metals, and other recyclable containers | Yes |
Food | No |
Cooking oil | Yes |
Plant materials | Yes |
Animal bedding | No |
White goods (i.e. appliances) | No |
Laboratory equipment | No |
Furniture | No |
Residence hall move-in/move-out waste | No |
Scrap metal | Yes |
Pallets | Yes |
Tires | Yes |
Other (please specify below) | No |
A brief description of other materials the institution has recycled, composted, donated and/or re-sold:
---
Optional Fields
Active Recovery and Reuse
---
Recycling Management
---
Does the institution use dual stream (two separate containers for recyclables, e.g. one for paper and another for plastic, glass, and metals) to collect standard recyclables (i.e. paper, plastic, glass, metals) in common areas?:
---
Does the institution use multi-stream recycling (multiple containers that further separate different types of materials) to collect standard recyclables (i.e. paper, plastic, glass, metals) in common areas?:
---
Contamination and Discard Rates
---
A brief description of any recycling quality control mechanisms employed, e.g. efforts to minimize contamination and/or monitor the discard rates of the materials recovery facilities and mills to which materials are diverted:
---
Programs and Initiatives
---
A brief description of the institution's waste audits and other initiatives to assess its materials management efforts and identify areas for improvement:
---
A brief description of the institution's procurement policies designed to prevent waste (e.g. by minimizing packaging and purchasing in bulk):
---
A brief description of the institution's surplus department or formal office supplies exchange program that facilitates reuse of materials:
---
A brief description of the institution's platforms to encourage peer-to-peer exchange and reuse (e.g. of electronics, furnishings, books and other goods):
---
A brief description of the institution's limits on paper and ink consumption (e.g. restricting free printing and/or mandating doubled-sided printing in libraries and computer labs):
---
A brief description of the institution's initiatives to make materials (e.g. course catalogs, course schedules, and directories) available online by default rather than printing them:
---
A brief description of the institution's program to reduce residence hall move-in/move-out waste:
---
A brief description of the institution's programs or initiatives to recover and reuse other materials intended for disposal:
---
The website URL where information about the programs or initiatives is available:
---
Additional documentation to support the submission:
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
The attached document explains how we were able to calculate our waste data.
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.