Overall Rating Silver - expired
Overall Score 57.04
Liaison Larry Cook
Submission Date Feb. 29, 2016
Executive Letter Download

STARS v2.0

University of South Carolina
OP-14: Office Paper Purchasing

Status Score Responsible Party
Complete 0.55 / 1.00 Namita Koppa
Assistant Director for Program Management
Office of Sustainability
"---" indicates that no data was submitted for this field

None
Does the institution have an institution-wide stated preference to purchase office paper that has recycled content and/or is certified to meet multi-criteria sustainability standards for paper?:
Yes

None
A copy of the paper purchasing policy, directive or guidelines:
---

None
The paper purchasing policy, directive or guidelines:
Office Supplies: The University currently utilizes the State Term contracts for office supplies. Their catalogs lists numerousitems identified as having recycled content material by the inclusion of the recycle ‘loop’ symbol. The copy paper purchased through the state recycled paper contract has a 30% recycle content, which meets federal guidelines.

None
A brief description of steps the institution has taken to ensure that the purchasing policy, directives, or guidelines are followed :
All purchasing of paper at the University of South Carolina is done through a centralized purchasing office, that requires the product to meet certain levels of recycled content. This also allows the purchaser to choose from FSC certified papers.

None
Does the institution wish to pursue Part 2 of this credit (expenditures on office paper)?:
Yes

None
Expenditures on office paper with the following levels of post-consumer recycled, agricultural residue, and/or FSC certified content::
Expenditure Per Level
10-29 percent 0 US/Canadian $
30-49 percent 287,227.73 US/Canadian $
50-69 percent 0 US/Canadian $
70-89 percent (or FSC Mix label) 0 US/Canadian $
90-100 percent (or FSC Recycled label) 0 US/Canadian $

None
Total expenditures on office paper :
287,227.73 US/Canadian $

None
The website URL where information about the paper purchasing policy, directive, or guidelines is available:
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
---

The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.