Overall Rating Gold
Overall Score 65.07
Liaison John Alejandro
Submission Date Oct. 22, 2024

STARS v2.2

University of San Diego
OP-11: Sustainable Procurement

Status Score Responsible Party
Complete 2.00 / 3.00 Milena LaBarbiera
Sustainability Coordinator
Office of Sustainability
"---" indicates that no data was submitted for this field

Part 1. Institution-wide sustainable procurement policies

Does the institution have written policies, guidelines, or directives that seek to support sustainable purchasing across multiple commodity categories institution-wide?:
Yes

A copy of the policies, guidelines or directives:
---

The policies, guidelines or directives:

Purchases on behalf of the university must consider the environment as well as economic and social responsibility. Sustainable purchasing allows the university to procure goods and services in a way that achieves value for money on a whole life basis, generating benefits not only for the university but also for the society and the economy, while reducing impacts to the environment. Purchases must meet the minimum green requirements and provided by an entity holding one of the university's recognized certification to be classified as sustainable. We have also incorporated an eProcurement system that allows our end users to quickly and easily identify vendors and items that meet our criteria. More information at: https://www.sandiego.edu/procurement/documents/usd-sustainable-procurement-guidelines.pdf 


Part 2. Life Cycle Cost Analysis 

Does the institution employ Life Cycle Cost Analysis (LCCA) when evaluating energy- and water-using products and systems?:
No

Which of the following best describes the institution’s use of LCCA?:
---

A brief description of the LCCA policy and/or practices:
---

Part 3. Product-specific sustainability criteria

To count, the criteria must address the specific sustainability challenges and impacts associated with products and/or services in each category, e.g. by requiring or giving preference to multi-criteria sustainability standards, certifications and labels appropriate to the category. Broader, institution-wide policies should be reported in Part 1, above. 

Chemically intensive products and services

Does the institution have published sustainability criteria to be applied when evaluating chemically intensive products and services?:
Yes

A brief description of the published sustainability criteria for chemically intensive products and services:

Cleaning Supplies must have one of the following certification or standards with a minimum of 50% of purchases certified by one or more of the recognized certifications. Green Seal, UL Ecologo, EPA Safer Choice, and FSC for janitorial paper products.


Consumable office products

Does the institution have published sustainability criteria to be applied when evaluating consumable office products?:
Yes

A brief description of the published sustainability criteria for consumable office products:

Copy paper and other paper office supplies must have a minimum of 30% PCRC or agricultural residue content and one of the following recognized certification or standards: FSC Recycled, PCRC, PCF, Green Seal, Agricultural residue content. Non-paper items must meet a minimum of 20% recycled content for writing utensils such as dry erase markers and be non-antimicrobial.


Furniture and furnishings

Does the institution have published sustainability criteria to be applied when evaluating furniture and furnishings?:
Yes

A brief description of the published sustainability criteria for furniture and furnishings:

Meet at least one of the recognized standards for furniture and/or textile - GREENGUARD Gold, SCS Indoor Advantage Gold, C2C.


Information Technology (IT) and equipment

Does the institution have published sustainability criteria to be applied when evaluating Information technology (IT) and equipment?:
Yes

A brief description of the published sustainability criteria for Information Technology (IT) and equipment:

Electronics - Energy Star or EPEAT standards. Toner - High Yield or re-manufactured recommended. Purchases must meet one of the recognized standards.


Food service providers

Does the institution have published sustainability criteria to be applied when evaluating food service providers?:
Yes

A brief description of the published sustainability criteria for food service providers:

Sustainable purchasing practices are followed for many products - food, packaging, merchandise and more. USD Dining selects vendors that have strong sustainability standards and practices. Dining requires consolidated food and merchandise deliveries from our vendors, thus cutting down on the use of natural resources and our carbon footprint while saving on costs. Dining utilizes a menu management software (CBord) that allows us to purchase products as needed. This also allows Dining to buy “just in time,” which reduces waste and our carbon footprint. Dining works closely with our prime food vendor, Sysco, to continue to provide an increasing number of sustainably sourced foods.

Organic and natural food and merchandise are available in all locations via a partnership with United Natural Foods, Inc. UNFI Sustainability Reports.

Fresh Point is the produce provider. The produce procurement priorities USD Dining has established are: #1 to be within the state of California; #2 within a 250 mile radius of USD; and #3 within the southwest US region. Menus also utilize ingredients from the on-campus community garden.

Coca-Cola is the prime beverage provider.

80% of baked goods are made within 5 miles of USD. This supports the local economy and decreases our carbon footprint.

All hamburger meat is grass-fed, GMO-free, and free range.

To-go boxes are made of 100% recycled fiber, 90% post-consumer material, and 10% pre-consumer material. Straws are biodegradable and made of agave pulp instead of plastic. Paper plates are made from 100% reclaimed fiber, unbleached and compostable. The vast majority of disposable packaging is greenware (made of recycled content and/or biodegradable). Clear cups for cold beverages are made of polylactic acid from corn. Cups for hot beverages are made from renewable fiber with polylactic acid lining. Coffee sleeves and napkins are made of 100% recycled fibers. Wood stir sticks are compostable. Disposable flatware (EarthChoice PSM Cutlery) is a blend of materials, the majority of which is starch. 50% of the base material comes from corn. It does not come from corn originally intended for human consumption and is not genetically modified.


Garments and linens 

Does the institution have published sustainability criteria to be applied when evaluating garments and linens?:
No

A brief description of the published sustainability criteria for garments and linens:

The University has contracted with CLC to issue licenses on its behalf. The CLC has strict Corporate Responsibility guidelines that vendors must follow in order to manufacture and produce products that contain the university logo.


Professional service providers

Does the institution have published sustainability criteria to be applied when evaluating professional service providers?:
Yes

A brief description of the published sustainability criteria for professional service providers:

As part of the Economic and Socially Responsible (EaSR) Spend category within the Sustainable Purchasing Guidelines, there is a stated preference for small businesses; minority-owned businesses; women-owned businesses; and/or veteran-owned businesses.


Transportation and fuels

Does the institution have published sustainability criteria to be applied when evaluating transportation and fuels?:
No

A brief description of the published sustainability criteria for transportation and fuels:

Not yet available.


Optional Fields 

Website URL where information about the institution’s sustainable procurement program or initiatives is available:
Additional documentation to support the submission:
---

Data source(s) and notes about the submission:

Procurement information provided by the Director Of Procurement Services.


The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.