Overall Rating | Silver - expired |
---|---|
Overall Score | 52.63 |
Liaison | Amy Kadrie |
Submission Date | Jan. 6, 2016 |
Executive Letter | Download |
University of Rochester
OP-14: Office Paper Purchasing
Status | Score | Responsible Party |
---|---|---|
0.42 / 1.00 |
Carl
Tietjen Associate Vice President for Purchasing and Supply Chain Purchasing |
"---"
indicates that no data was submitted for this field
None
Does the institution have an institution-wide stated preference to purchase office paper that has recycled content and/or is certified to meet multi-criteria sustainability standards for paper?:
Yes
None
A copy of the paper purchasing policy, directive or guidelines:
---
None
The paper purchasing policy, directive or guidelines:
http://www.urmc.rochester.edu/purchasing/SustainabilityPolicy.cfm
None
A brief description of steps the institution has taken to ensure that the purchasing policy, directives, or guidelines are followed :
Corporate Purchasing will be using environmental criteria in its selection of suppliers. Bidders are encouraged to provide detailed information about how they have mitigated their impact on the environment, and to consider value-added services that support the University of Rochester's commitment to preserve the environment, health and safety.
None
Does the institution wish to pursue Part 2 of this credit (expenditures on office paper)?:
Yes
None
Expenditures on office paper with the following levels of post-consumer recycled, agricultural residue, and/or FSC certified content::
Expenditure Per Level | |
10-29 percent | 851,679 US/Canadian $ |
30-49 percent | 56,875 US/Canadian $ |
50-69 percent | 6,785 US/Canadian $ |
70-89 percent (or FSC Mix label) | 238 US/Canadian $ |
90-100 percent (or FSC Recycled label) | 12,627 US/Canadian $ |
None
Total expenditures on office paper :
928,204
US/Canadian $
None
The website URL where information about the paper purchasing policy, directive, or guidelines is available:
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
---
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.