| Overall Rating | Gold - expired |
|---|---|
| Overall Score | 71.58 |
| Liaison | Sarah Stoeckl |
| Submission Date | May 18, 2017 |
| Executive Letter | Download |
University of Oregon
OP-16: Life Cycle Cost Analysis
| Status | Score | Responsible Party |
|---|---|---|
|
0.00 / 1.00 |
Steve
Mital Office of Sustainability Director Finance & Administration |
"---"
indicates that no data was submitted for this field
None
Does the the institution employ Life Cycle Cost Analysis (LCCA) as a matter of policy and practice when evaluating energy and water-using products and systems?:
No
None
Does the institution employ LCCA as a matter of policy and practice across the operations of the entire institution (i.e. all divisions)?:
No
None
A brief description of the LCCA policy(ies) and practice(s):
While the UO does not employ LCCA as a matter of policy and practice across the operations of the entire institition, numerous units and divisions take employ an LCCA on their own, especially for potentially high-impact purchases like vehicles. For example, Campus Operations recently conducted an LCCA to help them decide which police vehicles should make up their fleet.
None
The website URL where information about the institution’s LCCA policies and practices is available:
---
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
---
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.