Overall Rating Silver
Overall Score 57.64
Liaison Sustainability Office
Submission Date Feb. 7, 2019
Executive Letter Download

STARS v2.1

University of North Carolina, Greensboro
PA-11: Employee Compensation

Status Score Responsible Party
Complete 1.80 / 3.00 Victoria Benson
Deputy Chief HR Officer
Human Resources
"---" indicates that no data was submitted for this field

The local living wage (based on a family of four and expressed as an hourly wage):
14.80 US/Canadian $

Percentage of all employees (regular full-time, regular part-time, and temporary workers) that receive a living wage (benefits excluded):
100

Does the institution have employees of contractors that work on-site as part of regular and ongoing campus operations?:
Yes

Percentage of employees of contractors that work on-site as part of regular and ongoing campus operations that the institution has verified as receiving a living wage (benefits excluded) (0-100; enter ‘0’ if unknown):
100

The total compensation provided to the institution’s lowest paid regular (i.e., permanent) employee or pay grade meets or exceeds what percentage of the living wage?:
100 percent

A brief description of the minimum total compensation provided to the institution’s lowest paid employee or pay grade, including any in-kind benefits included as part of the total compensation figure :

Part-time employees paid at the lowest end of the salary ranges ($11.72/hr) are Subject to the Personnel Act (SPA) of the State of North Carolina and are afforded the same benefits offerings as other SPA employees with higher salaries, with some benefits prorated or deemed ineligible based on the part-time hours appointment.


Has the institution made a formal commitment to pay a living wage?:
Yes

A copy or brief description of the institution’s written policy stating its commitment to a living wage:

The University of North Carolina at Greensboro’s compensation philosophy is committed to the creation of an inclusive, collaborative, and responsive university by attracting, retaining, and developing a diverse community of talented individuals in support of the university's mission. As a public research university, UNCG must govern its resources in an efficient and effective way. Within the boundaries of financial feasibility, employee compensation will be administered in a manner that is externally competitive and internally equitable, recognizes performance, and includes, but is not limited to consideration of job independence and discretion, job complexity, scope, supervisory or lead roles, relevant experience and credentials, and additional position responsibilities. COMPENSATION OBJECTIVES: Administering compensation to reflect this philosophy means that salaries will be reviewed by the University on an ongoing basis. These analyses will support the institutions efforts to obtain appropriate salary funding from the state legislature.  As funding permits, salary increases shall focus on maintaining market alignment, supporting internal equity, retaining key personnel and recognizing performance. Within the parameters of discipline, function, job related experience, and performance and individual effectiveness, employees shall be paid similarly for similar work. Salaries for new employees should be established at levels that recognize individual skills, competencies, and experience while considering the salary levels of current employees with similar job duties. Further, UNCG ensures that contracts are closely monitored to ensure that proper compensation guidelines and policies are included.


Has the institution made a formal commitment to provide a living wage to its student employees and/or graduate teaching/research assistants (e.g. by adopting a student bill-of-rights)?:
No

A brief description of the institution’s commitment to a student living wage:
---

The website URL where information about the programs or initiatives is available:
Additional documentation to support the submission:
---

The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution and complete the Data Inquiry Form.