University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
PA-3: Institutional Governance
| Status | Score | Responsible Party |
|---|---|---|
|
1.75 / 4.00 |
Cindy
Shea Sustainability Director Sustainable Carolina |
"---"
indicates that no data was submitted for this field
3.1 Student participation in governance
Yes
Narrative and/or website URL outlining the ongoing bodies through which students can democratically participate in the governance of the institution:
Are one or more student representatives included as members of the institution’s highest decision-making body?:
Yes
Narrative and/or website URL outlining student representation on the institution’s highest decision-making body:
UNC Board of Trustees
Does at least one student representative have voting rights on the highest decision-making body?:
No
Description of other mechanisms used to consult students on institutional decisions, plans, or policies:
---
The Reporting Tool will automatically calculate the following figure:
0.75
3.2 Academic staff participation in governance
Yes
Narrative and/or website URL outlining the ongoing bodies through which academic staff can democratically participate in the governance of the institution:
Faculty Council
Are one or more academic staff representatives included as members of the institution’s highest decision-making body?:
No
Narrative and/or website URL outlining academic staff representation on the institution’s highest decision-making body:
---
Does at least one academic staff representative have voting rights on the institution’s highest decision-making body?:
No
Description of other mechanisms used to consult academic staff on institutional decisions, plans, or policies:
---
The Reporting Tool will automatically calculate the following figure:
0.50
3.3 Non-academic staff participation in governance
Yes
Narrative and/or website URL outlining the ongoing bodies through which non-academic staff can democratically participate in the governance of the institution:
Employee Forum
Are one or more staff members representing non-managerial workers included as members of the institution’s highest decision-making body?:
No
Narrative and/or website URL outlining non-academic staff representation on the institution’s highest decision-making body:
---
Does at least one staff member representing non-managerial workers have voting rights on the institution’s highest decision-making body?:
No
Description of other mechanisms used to consult non-academic staff on institutional decisions, plans, or policies:
---
The Reporting Tool will automatically calculate the following figure:
0.50
3.4 Community participation in governance
No
Narrative and/or website URL outlining the ongoing bodies through which local community-based organizations can democratically participate in the governance of the institution:
---
Has the institution used one or more ad hoc mechanisms during the previous three years to consult local community members on institutional decisions, plans, or policies?:
No
Narrative and/or website URL outlining the ad hoc mechanisms used during the previous three years to consult local community members on institutional decisions, plans, or policies:
---
The Reporting Tool will automatically calculate the following figure:
0
Optional documentation
---
Additional documentation for this credit:
---
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.