Overall Rating Gold
Overall Score 67.00
Liaison Cindy Shea
Submission Date Nov. 13, 2024

STARS v3.0

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
OP-10: Purchased Goods

Status Score Responsible Party
Complete 1.38 / 4.00 Troy Morse
Director
Purchasing Services
"---" indicates that no data was submitted for this field

10.1 Percentage of cleaning products spend that meets sustainability criteria

Local currency code:
USD

Does the institution have sufficient data on its cleaning product spend to pursue this indicator?:
Yes

Performance year for cleaning products spend:
2023

Total annual spend on cleaning products:
171,540

Annual spend on cleaning products that meet preferable sustainability criteria:
56,721

Annual spend on cleaning products that meet other qualifying sustainability criteria:
0

List or sample of cleaning product purchases that meet sustainability criteria:

Cleaning chemicals - PortionPac Chemicals - Green Seal Certified

Trash can liners - Revolution Brand Liners - Ecologo Certified to UL126

Foam Soap - Gojo - EcoLogo and Green Seal Certified

 

 


The Reporting Tool will automatically calculate the following three figures:

 

Percentage of cleaning product spend that meets preferable sustainability criteria:
33.07

Percentage of cleaning product spend that meets other qualifying sustainability criteria:
0

Points earned for indicator OP 10.1:
0.33

10.2 Percentage of electronics spend that meets sustainability criteria

Does the institution have sufficient data on its electronics spend to pursue this indicator?:
Yes

Performance year for electronics product spend:
2023

Total annual spend on electronics:
10,780,000

Annual spend on electronics that meet preferable sustainability criteria:
9,180,000

Annual spend on electronics spend that meet other qualifying sustainability criteria:
1,600,000

List or sample of electronics purchases that meet sustainability criteria:

Lenova and Apple, primarily EPEAT Gold

Some EPEAT Silver

All electronics meet Energy STAR criteria

 


The Reporting Tool will automatically calculate the following three figures:

Percentage of electronics spend that meets preferable sustainability criteria:
85.16

Percentage of electronics spend that meets other qualifying sustainability criteria:
14.84

Points earned for indicator OP 10.2:
0.93

10.3 Percentage of furniture spend that meets sustainability criteria

Does the institution have sufficient data on its furniture spend to pursue this indicator?:
No

Performance year for furniture spend:
---

Total annual spend on furniture:
---

Annual spend on furniture that meets preferable sustainability criteria:
---

Annual spend on furniture that meets other qualifying sustainability criteria:
---

List or sample of furniture purchases that meet sustainability criteria:
---

The Reporting Tool will automatically calculate the following three figures:

Percentage of furniture spend that meets preferable sustainability criteria:
---

Percentage of furniture spend that meets other qualifying sustainability criteria:
---

Points earned for indicator OP 10.3:
0

10.4 Percentage of office paper spend that meets sustainability criteria

Does the institution have sufficient data on its office paper spend to pursue this indicator?:
Yes

Performance year for office paper spend:
2023

Total annual spend on office paper:
193,400

Annual spend on office paper that meets preferable sustainability criteria:
---

Annual spend on office paper that meets other qualifying sustainability criteria:
46,400

List or sample of office paper purchases that meet sustainability criteria:

ECO-ID or ECO aware purchases from Staples. Minimum 30% post-consumer recycled content.


The Reporting Tool will automatically calculate the following three figures:

Percentage of office paper spend that meets preferable sustainability criteria:
0

Percentage of office paper spend that meets other qualifying sustainability criteria:
23.99

Points earned for indicator OP 10.4:
0.12

Optional documentation

Notes about the information provided for this credit:
---

Additional documentation for this credit:
---

The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.