| Overall Rating | Gold - expired |
|---|---|
| Overall Score | 69.87 |
| Liaison | Cindy Shea |
| Submission Date | Dec. 23, 2020 |
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
OP-18: Waste Minimization and Diversion
| Status | Score | Responsible Party |
|---|---|---|
|
3.54 / 8.00 |
BJ
Tipton Program Manager, Solid Waste Services Facilities Services |
Figures needed to determine total waste generated (and diverted):
| Performance Year | Baseline Year | |
| Materials recycled | 3,669 Tons | 3,299.52 Tons |
| Materials composted | 646 Tons | 256.48 Tons |
| Materials donated or re-sold | 21 Tons | 0 Tons |
| Materials disposed through post-recycling residual conversion | 0 Tons | 0 Tons |
| Materials disposed in a solid waste landfill or incinerator | 5,957 Tons | 6,819 Tons |
| Total waste generated | 10,293 Tons | 10,375 Tons |
A brief description of the residual conversion facility:
Start and end dates of the performance year and baseline year (or three-year periods):
| Start Date | End Date | |
| Performance Period | July 1, 2018 | June 30, 2019 |
| Baseline Period | July 1, 2000 | June 30, 2001 |
A brief description of when and why the waste generation baseline was adopted:
The university became the first in the state to hire a full-time Sustainability Coordinator in 2001.
Figures needed to determine "Weighted Campus Users”:
| Performance Year | Baseline Year | |
| Number of students resident on-site | 8,554 | 7,063 |
| Number of employees resident on-site | 17 | 0 |
| Number of other individuals resident on-site | 198 | 0 |
| Total full-time equivalent student enrollment | 29,272 | 22,999.75 |
| Full-time equivalent of employees | 13,329 | 9,457.14 |
| Full-time equivalent of students enrolled exclusively in distance education | 1,007 | 550.50 |
| Weighted campus users | 33,536.25 | 25,695.54 |
Total waste generated per weighted campus user:
| Performance Year | Baseline Year | |
| Total waste generated per weighted campus user | 0.31 Tons | 0.40 Tons |
Percentage reduction in total waste generated per weighted campus user from baseline:
Percentage of materials diverted from the landfill or incinerator by recycling, composting, donating or re-selling, performance year:
Percentage of materials diverted from the landfill or incinerator (including up to 10 percent attributable to post-recycling residual conversion):
In the waste figures reported above, has the institution recycled, composted, donated and/or re-sold the following materials?:
| Yes or No | |
| Paper, plastics, glass, metals, and other recyclable containers | Yes |
| Food | Yes |
| Cooking oil | Yes |
| Plant materials | Yes |
| Animal bedding | No |
| White goods (i.e. appliances) | Yes |
| Electronics | Yes |
| Laboratory equipment | Yes |
| Furniture | Yes |
| Residence hall move-in/move-out waste | Yes |
| Scrap metal | Yes |
| Pallets | Yes |
| Tires | Yes |
| Other (please specify below) | Yes |
A brief description of other materials the institution has recycled, composted, donated and/or re-sold:
Construction and demolition materials, concrete and block, auto oil filters, auto coolant, auto batteries, mattress bags, bulk solvent, carpet, other e-waste.
Materials intended for disposal but subsequently recovered and reused on campus, performance year:
Does the institution use single stream recycling to collect standard recyclables in common areas?:
Does the institution use dual stream recycling to collect standard recyclables in common areas?:
Does the institution use multi-stream recycling to collect standard recyclables in common areas?:
Average contamination rate for the institution’s recycling program:
A brief description of any recycling quality control mechanisms employed:
A brief description of the institution's waste-related behavior change initiatives:
Signage is pervasive in labs, office buildings, and residence halls.
A brief description of the institution's waste audits and other initiatives to assess its materials management efforts and identify areas for improvement:
New initiatives moving the campus towards zero waste called for a suite of waste audits to benchmark current campus behavior. A consultant was hired to conduct these audits.
A brief description of the institution's procurement policies designed to prevent waste:
Bulk dispensers are used to reduce packaging in the Dining Halls, i.e. - juices, sodas, milk, ketchup, mustard, mayonnaise, BBQ sauce, and cereals.
A brief description of the institution's surplus department or formal office supplies exchange program that facilitates reuse of materials:
University property considered unusable or unserviceable is sent to the Surplus Property Warehouse. The Warehouse sells used equipment and furniture at deeply discounted prices to University departments and the general public.
The Glass Shop repairs scientific glassware for reuse.
A brief description of the institution's platforms to encourage peer-to-peer exchange and reuse:
A brief description of the institution's limits on paper and ink consumption:
At the beginning of each semester “ITS Print Plan” funds become available for all full-time, fee-paying students. Students can print $40 / 800 pages per semester and $17.50 / 350 pages for each summer session. Black and white printing costs $.05 per side of printed material. Color printing costs $.30 per side. The ITS Print Plan fund can only be used towards printing done in the ITS Labs supported locations. The funds do not roll over to the next semester or session. Double-sided printing is the default setting.
A brief description of the institution's initiatives to make materials available online by default rather than printing them:
Course catalogs, campus directories, accounting forms, and purchasing requisitions are now available electronically instead of printed.
A brief description of the institution's program to reduce residence hall move-in/move-out waste:
When almost 10,000 students move onto campus in a week, the Office of Waste Reduction and Recycling recruits additional personnel to staff dumpster sites. These crews recover cardboard, plastic film and polystyrene.
During move-out in May, the Department of Housing and Residential Education and the Office of Waste Reduction and Recycling set up donation stations in each residence hall or community. Residents may donate clothing, office supplies, personal care items, furniture, appliances, books, and food.
Since 2012, donations are picked up and used by Durham-based non-profit TROSA (Triangle Residential Options for Substance Abusers), which uses the items in their residential treatment programs or multiple reuse businesses. Broken electronics are sent for recycling to American Greenz in Durham, and used bedding is donated to Paws4Ever, a local no-kill animal shelter.
DHRE and OWRR promote the donation stations using a social marketing campaign--“Don’t Ditch It. Donate It!”-- throughout residence hall and campus media.
A brief description of the institution's programs or initiatives to recover and reuse other materials intended for disposal:
An active tailgate recycling program, and post-game recycling collection in the football stadium, diverts materials from the landfill. UNC competes in the Game Day Challenge, a friendly competition between colleges and universities to see which institution can reduce and recycle the most waste from a single home football game. UNC participated in the first RecycleMania Basketball Game Day Challenge as well.
Website URL where information about the institution’s waste minimization and diversion efforts is available:
Additional documentation to support the submission:
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.