| Overall Rating | Gold - expired |
|---|---|
| Overall Score | 71.75 |
| Liaison | Cindy Shea |
| Submission Date | July 24, 2017 |
| Executive Letter | Download |
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
IN-9: Green Laboratories
| Status | Score | Responsible Party |
|---|---|---|
|
0.50 / 0.50 |
Amy
Preble Recycling Outreach Coordinator Office of Waste Reduction and Recycling |
"---"
indicates that no data was submitted for this field
Does the institution’s green laboratory program address the following?:
| Yes or No | |
| Energy conservation and efficiency, e.g. fume hood ("shut the sash") and freezer maintenance programs | Yes |
| Water conservation and efficiency | Yes |
| Chemical use and disposal | Yes |
| Materials management, e.g. green purchasing guidelines and recycling and reuse programs | Yes |
| Training for lab users on sustainable practices | Yes |
A brief description of the green laboratory program, including the specific initiatives selected above:
The Green Labs Committee meets monthly to advance sustainable practices. A capstone project led by the co-chairs of the committee resulted in the publication of Green Labs at Carolina: A Best Practices Guide. The guide includes a checklist and recommendations related to energy and water conservation, waste reduction, and purchasing. Posters on lab recycling and energy management now hang in university labs. Environment Health and Safety includes green labs training in their safety trainings. The campus energy manager hosted a student intern to assess plug load energy use in laboratories and make recommendations for improvements. Lab-specific recycling infrastructure has been expanded and the number of air changes per hour in many campus labs has been reduced down to six. Lab personnel are encouraged to buy the smallest possible quantities of chemicals, to clearly label all chemical containers, to share chemicals with other labs, and to notify EHS when chemicals require disposal or labs are closed out.
Optional Fields
Additional documentation to support the submission:
---
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
---
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.