| Overall Rating | Bronze - expired |
|---|---|
| Overall Score | 35.20 |
| Liaison | Laura Miller |
| Submission Date | Aug. 1, 2019 |
| Executive Letter | Download |
University of New Haven
AC-11: Open Access to Research
| Status | Score | Responsible Party |
|---|---|---|
|
0.00 / 2.00 |
Hanko
Dobi University Librarian Office of the Senior Vice President for Academic Affairs and Provost |
How many of the institution’s research-producing divisions are covered by a published open access policy that ensures that versions of future scholarly articles by faculty and staff are deposited in a designated open access repository? (All, Some or None):
Which of the following best describes the open access policy? (Mandatory or Voluntary):
Does the institution provide financial incentives to support faculty members with article processing and other open access publication charges?:
A brief description of the open access policy, including the date adopted, any incentives or supports provided, and the repository(ies) used:
The University of New Haven utilizes the Digital Commons Website to share, publish, and track the impact of faculty scholarship and research. This Website was adopted for use in 2013.
A copy of the institution's open access policy:
The institution's open access policy:
The University of New Haven supports the use of Digital Commons for the expansion of scholarly communication – the system by which researchers share the results of their research with their colleagues. It ensures that the intellectual output of the University of New Haven is disseminated broadly, rapidly, and openly while making it easily discoverable around the world.
The website URL where the open access repository is available:
Estimated percentage of scholarly articles published annually by the institution’s faculty and staff that are deposited in a designated open access repository (0-100):
A brief description of how the institution’s library(ies) support open access to research:
The website URL where information about the programs or initiatives is available:
Additional documentation to support the submission:
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.