Overall Rating | Platinum |
---|---|
Overall Score | 85.89 |
Liaison | Jennifer Andrews |
Submission Date | Oct. 24, 2024 |
University of New Hampshire
PA-10: Sustainable Investment
Status | Score | Responsible Party |
---|---|---|
3.00 / 3.00 |
Erik
Gross Treasurer UNH Foundation |
Part 1. Positive sustainability investment
Value of holdings in each of the following categories:
Value of holdings | |
Sustainable industries (e.g., renewable energy or sustainable forestry) | 0 US/Canadian $ |
Businesses selected for exemplary sustainability performance (e.g., using criteria specified in a sustainable investment policy) | 200,997,998 US/Canadian $ |
Sustainability investment funds (e.g., a renewable energy or impact investment fund) | 0 US/Canadian $ |
Community development financial institutions (CDFIs) or the equivalent | 1,648,811 US/Canadian $ |
Socially responsible mutual funds with positive screens (or the equivalent) | 0 US/Canadian $ |
Green revolving funds funded from the endowment | 0 US/Canadian $ |
If any of the above is greater than zero, provide:
The UNH Foundation endowment assets are invested almost entirely in pooled vehicles managed by third-party managers. The Foundation invests about 0.5% of its assets with the New Hampshire Community Loan Fund, a CDFI serving several important and underserved communities in the NH loan market.
Fund managers exhibiting “exemplary sustainability performance” exist across all segments of the Foundation’s portfolio. This assessment is based on comprehensive ESG survey data updated and compiled annually by the Foundation’s consultant Prime Buchholz. The resulting fund manager scores on a scale of 0-5 show that the Foundation’s portfolio has a weighted average score of 3.06. The UNH Foundation designates scores greater than 3.0 as exemplary ESG-qualified fund managers. (We increased the threshold from 2.5, the cutoff in our 2021 submission.) 38 of the Foundation’s 60 fund managers are in this exemplary scoring tier, comprising 63% of the Foundation’s assets under management.
Representative characteristics of the managers demonstrating exemplary sustainability performance:
- 21 of the pooled funds are UN PRI signatories and 33 funds have a well-articulated ESG policy; 17 have made both commitments.
- 32 funds have DEI policies/initiatives.
Percentage of the institution's investment pool in positive sustainability investments:
Part 2. Investor engagement
Sustainable investment policy
A brief description of how the sustainable investment policy is applied:
The Foundation’s Investment Committee collaborates with Prime Buchholz, its consultant, to select fund managers for the portfolio as guided by the Foundation’s investment policy statement, which stipulates that ESG factors will be reviewed in the selection process for all new managers, as well as in the ongoing monitoring of existing managers. Their review ensures that the committee consistently discusses managers through this ESG lens. Prime Buchholz periodically issues research reports to the committee using various screens (fossil fuels, private prisons, weapons, etc.) so that the committee can routinely review the portfolio’s exposure to these issues.
Prime Buchholz conducts their ESG and DEI surveys annually. As part of these annual engagements, Prime Buchholz reinforces with our fund managers the importance and value we place on using sustainable investing principles in the investment process. Prime shares ESG and DEI fund manager level detail and portfolio-wide analysis report with the Foundation’s investment committee yearly and as needed throughout the year.
Proxy voting
While virtually all of the Foundation’s investments are in commingled funds and thus do not permit direct proxy voting by the Foundation to underlying managers, the Foundation has issued letters to all fund managers encouraging them to vote proxies with sustainable investing principles in mind.
Shareholder resolutions
Examples of how the institution has engaged with corporations in its portfolio about sustainability issues during the previous three years:
Divestment efforts and negative screens
A brief description of the divestment effort or negative screens and how they have been implemented:
Approximate percentage of endowment that the divestment effort and/or negative screens apply to:
Investor networks
The UNH Foundation has been a member of the Intentional Endowments Network (IEN) since 2018, and Erik Gross, the Foundation’s treasurer, and some members of the Committee on Investor Responsibility have participated on a number of IEN conference panels regarding UNH’s sustainable investing experiences over the last several years. Mr. Gross has been a member of the IEN steering committee for the past 3 years and recently joined IEN’s executive committee. He has also participated on IEN’s Sustainable Retirement Plans task force.
Optional Fields
Additional documentation to support the submission:
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.