Overall Rating Silver - expired
Overall Score 62.46
Liaison Morgan Hartman
Submission Date Jan. 31, 2020

STARS v2.2

University of Nebraska - Lincoln
OP-18: Waste Minimization and Diversion

Status Score Responsible Party
Complete 4.62 / 8.00 Rich Wahl
Construction Manager
Facilities Managment & Planning
"---" indicates that no data was submitted for this field

Parts 1 and 2. Waste per person

Figures needed to determine total waste generated (and diverted):
Performance Year Baseline Year
Materials recycled 2,047 Tons 1,323 Tons
Materials composted 0 Tons 0 Tons
Materials donated or re-sold 789 Tons 1,479 Tons
Materials disposed through post-recycling residual conversion 0 Tons 0 Tons
Materials disposed in a solid waste landfill or incinerator 2,345 Tons 2,984 Tons
Total waste generated 5,181 Tons 5,786 Tons

If reporting post-recycling residual conversion, provide:

A brief description of the residual conversion facility:
---

Start and end dates of the performance year and baseline year (or three-year periods):
Start Date End Date
Performance Period Jan. 1, 2018 Dec. 31, 2018
Baseline Period Jan. 1, 2009 Dec. 31, 2009

If end date of the baseline year/period is 2004 or earlier, provide:

A brief description of when and why the waste generation baseline was adopted:
n/a

Figures needed to determine "Weighted Campus Users”:
Performance Year Baseline Year
Number of students resident on-site 6,165 8,034
Number of employees resident on-site 0 0
Number of other individuals resident on-site 0 0
Total full-time equivalent student enrollment 25,820 20,054
Full-time equivalent of employees 3,797 3,372
Full-time equivalent of students enrolled exclusively in distance education 0 746
Weighted campus users 23,754 19,018.50

Total waste generated per weighted campus user:
Performance Year Baseline Year
Total waste generated per weighted campus user 0.22 Tons 0.30 Tons

Percentage reduction in total waste generated per weighted campus user from baseline:
28.31

Part 3. Waste diverted from the landfill or incinerator

Percentage of materials diverted from the landfill or incinerator by recycling, composting, donating or re-selling, performance year:
54.74

Percentage of materials diverted from the landfill or incinerator (including up to 10 percent attributable to post-recycling residual conversion):
54.74

In the waste figures reported above, has the institution recycled, composted, donated and/or re-sold the following materials?:
Yes or No
Paper, plastics, glass, metals, and other recyclable containers Yes
Food No
Cooking oil Yes
Plant materials Yes
Animal bedding No
White goods (i.e. appliances) Yes
Electronics Yes
Laboratory equipment No
Furniture Yes
Residence hall move-in/move-out waste Yes
Scrap metal Yes
Pallets Yes
Tires Yes
Other (please specify below) Yes

A brief description of other materials the institution has recycled, composted, donated and/or re-sold:
The University has also recycled, composted, donated, and/or re-sold Cartridges, Light Bulbs, Mercury Items, Oil filters, Antifreeze, Batteries, Ballasts, and Motor Oil.

Optional Fields 

Active Recovery and Reuse

Materials intended for disposal but subsequently recovered and reused on campus, performance year:
---

Recycling Management 

Does the institution use single stream recycling to collect standard recyclables in common areas?:
No

Does the institution use dual stream recycling to collect standard recyclables in common areas?:
No

Does the institution use multi-stream recycling to collect standard recyclables in common areas?:
Yes

Contamination and Discard Rates 

Average contamination rate for the institution’s recycling program:
---

A brief description of any recycling quality control mechanisms employed:
---

Programs and Initiatives 

A brief description of the institution's waste-related behavior change initiatives:
In 2019 the University started a project to replace all of the recycling bins on campus to increase recycling rates and decrease contamination. The project will reduce confusion among students and staff alike with universal signage and coloration.

A brief description of the institution's waste audits and other initiatives to assess its materials management efforts and identify areas for improvement:
ESC waste audits

A brief description of the institution's procurement policies designed to prevent waste:
UNL Procurement Services pursues the promotion, development and procurement of environmentally preferred goods and services whenever possible. Procurement Services will work with departments, employees, contractors and vendors alike to seek out and provide resources and information that will enable our customers to make informed purchasing decisions, while promoting environmental stewardship.

UNL Procurement Services is committed to buying more environmentally preferable goods and services as long as they meet our performance needs and they are available within a reasonable period of time at a reasonable cost. By including environmental considerations in our procurement decisions, along with our traditional concerns with price, performance and availability, we will remain fiscally responsible while promoting products and services that have a reduced effect on human health and the environment.

UNL’s “Green Purchasing” strategy is to develop policies consistent with the following:

1. Minimize the consumption of natural resources by reviewing current and proposed future usage and evaluating the pros and cons of alternatives.
2. Seek alternatives to products and processes that are detrimental to the environment by using more “environmentally friendly” products and processes.
3. Minimize waste, including any packaging, waste produced by the product (or service) in questions, and waste generated by the eventual disposal of the product.
4. Maximize the reuse and recycling of materials.
Stimulate demand for “environmentally friendly” products by letting manufacturers and suppliers know the environmental performance we are looking for in products.

A brief description of the institution's surplus department or formal office supplies exchange program that facilitates reuse of materials:
UNL Inventory Department disposes property by transferring it to a different department or institution, trading it in, through public sales, or by salvaging it. More information about UNL Inventory can be found at: http://inventory.unl.edu/

Auction information can be found at: http://inventory.unl.edu/public-auctions/

A brief description of the institution's platforms to encourage peer-to-peer exchange and reuse:
---

A brief description of the institution's limits on paper and ink consumption:
UNL encourages all copiers to be set to make double-sided copies as the default if they have the capacity.

A brief description of the institution's initiatives to make materials available online by default rather than printing them:
---

A brief description of the institution's program to reduce residence hall move-in/move-out waste:
During the move-in period, UNL Recycling sets up additional cardboard recycling stations throughout the residence halls. University RA's also monitor the waste flow into dumpsters for recyclable material.

UNL also provides extra donation and recycling containers for students during the move-out periods. They partner with organizations such as Goodwill to make sure materials are recovered and put back to good use.

A brief description of the institution's programs or initiatives to recover and reuse other materials intended for disposal:
UNL has a program in place to recycle, reuse, and/or refurbish all unwanted electronic and computer equipment. All electronic items are first offered for redistribution through the UNL Inventory Department. Those items that are not redistributed are then offered at public auction. Items that are not sold at public auction are sent for refurbishment via Apple's Recycling program.

Website URL where information about the institution’s waste minimization and diversion efforts is available:
Additional documentation to support the submission:
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
---

The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.