| Overall Rating | Silver - expired |
|---|---|
| Overall Score | 53.27 |
| Liaison | Morgan Hartman |
| Submission Date | Feb. 20, 2018 |
| Executive Letter | Download |
University of Nebraska - Lincoln
OP-11: Sustainable Procurement
| Status | Score | Responsible Party |
|---|---|---|
|
1.75 / 3.00 |
Mikki
Sandin Project Coordinator Procurement Services |
"---"
indicates that no data was submitted for this field
Part 1: Institution-Wide Policies
Yes
A copy of the policies, guidelines or directives:
---
The policies, guidelines or directives:
http://procurement.unl.edu/policies#sustainable-purchasing
Sustainable Purchasing
University of Nebraska Procurement Services pursues the promotion, development and procurement of environmentally preferred goods and services whenever possible. Procurement Services will work with departments, employees, contractors and suppliers alike to seek out and provide resources and information that will enable our customers to make informed purchasing decisions, while promoting environmental stewardship.
Procurement Services is committed to buying more environmentally preferable goods and services as long as they meet our performance needs and are available within a reasonable period of time at a reasonable cost. By including environmental considerations in our procurement decisions, along with our traditional concerns with price, performance and availability, we will remain fiscally responsible while promoting products and services that have a reduced effect on human health and the environment.
Our “Green Purchasing” strategy is to develop policies consistent with the following:
Minimize the consumption of natural resources by reviewing current and proposed future usage and evaluating the pros and cons of alternatives.
Seek alternatives to products and processes that are detrimental to the environment by using more “environmentally friendly” products and processes.
Minimize waste, including any packaging, waste produced by the product (or service) in question, and waste generated by the eventual disposal of the product.
Maximize the reuse and recycling of materials.
Stimulate demand for “environmentally friendly” products by letting manufacturers and suppliers know the environmental performance we are looking for in products.
Part 2: Life Cycle Cost Analysis
Yes
Which of the following best describes the institution’s use of LCCA?:
Institution employs LCCA as a matter of policy and standard practice when evaluating all energy- and water-using products, systems and building components
A brief description of the LCCA policy and/or practices:
Life Cycle Cost: Each design decision that significantly impacts long term energy use shall be based on a life cycle cost (LCC) analysis incorporating construction, energy and operating and maintenance costs.
Part 3: Commodity-Specific Sustainability Criteria
To count, the criteria must address the specific sustainability challenges and impacts associated with products/services in each category, e.g. by requiring or giving preference to multi-criteria sustainability standards, certifications and labels appropriate to the category. Broader, institution-wide policies should be reported in Part 1, above.
Chemically Intensive Products and Services
Yes
A brief description of the published sustainability criteria for chemically intensive products and services:
http://fmo.unl.edu/custodial-services/custodial-services-sustainability-initiative
Construction and Renovation
No
A brief description of the published sustainability criteria for construction and renovation products:
---
Information Technology (IT)
No
A brief description of the published sustainability criteria for IT products and services:
---
Food Services
No
A brief description of the published sustainability criteria for food services:
---
Garments and Linens
No
A brief description of the published sustainability criteria for garments and linens:
---
Professional Services
No
A brief description of the published sustainability criteria for professional services:
---
Transportation and Fuels
No
A brief description of the published sustainability criteria for transportation and fuels:
---
Wood and Paper
No
A brief description of the published sustainability criteria for wood and paper products:
---
Other Commodity Categories
No
A brief description of the published sustainability criteria for other commodity categories:
---
Optional Fields
---
Additional documentation to support the submission:
---
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
---
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.