| Overall Rating | Silver - expired |
|---|---|
| Overall Score | 54.78 |
| Liaison | Luc Surprenant |
| Submission Date | Dec. 20, 2019 |
Université de Montréal
OP-11: Sustainable Procurement
| Status | Score | Responsible Party |
|---|---|---|
|
1.25 / 3.00 |
Luc
Surprenant Consultant, Sustainable Development Vice rector's office, Finances and Infrastructures |
"---"
indicates that no data was submitted for this field
Part 1. Institution-wide sustainable procurement policies
Yes
A copy of the policies, guidelines or directives:
The policies, guidelines or directives:
The Université de Montréal is committed to sustainable development and expects the same commitment from its suppliers as well as ethical sourcing practices throughout their supply chain. The code of conduct demonstrates an institutional commitment to work for continuous improvement towards excellence.
Suppliers of goods and services are expected to subscribe and to ensure that their operating practices and those of their own suppliers are in sync with the commitments of the University's code of conduct.
Suppliers of goods and services are expected to subscribe and to ensure that their operating practices and those of their own suppliers are in sync with the commitments of the University's code of conduct.
Part 2. Life Cycle Cost Analysis
No
Which of the following best describes the institution’s use of LCCA?:
---
A brief description of the LCCA policy and/or practices:
---
Part 3. Product-specific sustainability criteria
To count, the criteria must address the specific sustainability challenges and impacts associated with products and/or services in each category, e.g. by requiring or giving preference to multi-criteria sustainability standards, certifications and labels appropriate to the category. Broader, institution-wide policies should be reported in Part 1, above.
Chemically intensive products and services
No
A brief description of the published sustainability criteria for chemically intensive products and services:
---
Consumable office products
Yes
A brief description of the published sustainability criteria for consumable office products:
Paper purchased by the University’s Printing Services must contain 30% of post-consumer recycled fiber
Printing Services also establish other sustainability criteria for asks of interest in order to compare products and make sustainable decisions. These criteria include:
- weight
- FSC certification
Printing Services also establish other sustainability criteria for asks of interest in order to compare products and make sustainable decisions. These criteria include:
- weight
- FSC certification
Furniture and furnishings
No
A brief description of the published sustainability criteria for furniture and furnishings:
---
Information Technology (IT) and equipment
Yes
A brief description of the published sustainability criteria for Information Technology (IT) and equipment:
Although asks of interest do not mention it explicitly, the Direction Générale des technologies de l'information et des Communications
(DGTIC) requires that all computers meet the EPEAT gold standard at the stage of equipment standardization.
(DGTIC) requires that all computers meet the EPEAT gold standard at the stage of equipment standardization.
Food service providers
Yes
A brief description of the published sustainability criteria for food service providers:
The call for offers published in 2019 by the University’s Food Services contains a sustainability section that identifies products that are associated with at least one criterion of sustainability and the products for which the University wishes to integrate sustainable alternatives in the upcoming years.
Food Services also have other suppliers for particular products such as dairies, coffee, pastas and granola bars. In these cases the choice of a supplier was partially based on sustainability criteria, such as the general quality of food, nutritional values, and locality.
Food Services also have other suppliers for particular products such as dairies, coffee, pastas and granola bars. In these cases the choice of a supplier was partially based on sustainability criteria, such as the general quality of food, nutritional values, and locality.
Garments and linens
No
A brief description of the published sustainability criteria for garments and linens:
---
Professional service providers
No
A brief description of the published sustainability criteria for professional service providers:
---
Transportation and fuels
No
A brief description of the published sustainability criteria for transportation and fuels:
---
Optional Fields
---
Additional documentation to support the submission:
---
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
---
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.