Overall Rating | Gold - expired |
---|---|
Overall Score | 65.93 |
Liaison | Srinivasan Raghavan |
Submission Date | Feb. 24, 2015 |
Executive Letter | Download |
University of Missouri
OP-4: Building Design and Construction
Status | Score | Responsible Party |
---|---|---|
1.04 / 3.00 |
Alicia
LaVaute Sr. Recycling & Waste Minimization Specialist Sustainability Office |
"---"
indicates that no data was submitted for this field
None
Does the institution have any building space certified under the following green building rating systems for new construction and major renovations?:
Yes or No | |
LEED or another 4-tier rating system used by an Established Green Building Council (GBC) | Yes |
The DGNB system, Green Star, or another 3-tier GBC rating system | No |
BREEAM, CASBEE, or another 5-tier GBC rating system | No |
The Living Building Challenge | No |
Other non-GBC rating systems (e.g. BOMA BESt, Green Globes) | No |
None
A brief description of the green building rating system(s) used and/or a list of certified buildings and ratings:
University of Missouri utilizes a campus-wide approach to sustainable construction thought the continued development and implementation of Sustainable Design Guidelines. The MU Sustainable Design Guidelines set standards for design and construction that at minimum meets the requirements of LEED Certified construction.
None
Total floor area of eligible building space (design and construction):
443,945
Square feet
None
Floor area of building space that is certified at each level under a 4-tier rating system for new construction and major renovations used by an Established Green Building Council::
Certified Floor Area | |
Minimum Level (e.g. LEED Certified) | 20,548 Square feet |
3rd Highest Level (e.g. LEED Silver) | 0 Square feet |
2nd Highest Level (e.g. LEED Gold) | 0 Square feet |
Highest Achievable Level (e.g. LEED Platinum) | 0 Square feet |
None
Floor area of building space that is certified at each level under a 3-tier rating system for new construction and major renovations used by an Established Green Building Council::
Certified Floor Area | |
Minimum Level | 0 Square feet |
Mid-Level | 0 Square feet |
Highest Achievable Level | 0 Square feet |
None
Floor area of building space that is certified at each level under a 5-tier rating system for new construction and major renovations used by an Established Green Building Council::
Certified Floor Area | |
Minimum Level | 0 Square feet |
4th Highest Level | 0 Square feet |
Mid-Level | 0 Square feet |
2nd Highest Level | 0 Square feet |
Highest Achievable Level | 0 Square feet |
None
Floor area of building space certified Living under the Living Building Challenge:
0
Square feet
None
Floor area of building space that is certified at any level under other green building rating systems for new construction and major renovations:
0
Square feet
None
Floor area of building space that was designed and constructed in accordance with green building policies or guidelines but NOT certified:
381,301
Square feet
None
A copy of the guidelines or policies :
None
The date the guidelines or policies were adopted:
Aug. 22, 2011
None
A brief description of the green building guidelines or policies and/or a list or sample of buildings covered:
To further the Campus’ commitment to sustainable design, the University developed a campus-wide approach to sustainable building using LEED as a framework. MU held its first workshop to develop this approach to building facility sustainability in May of 2011. The resulting collection of strategies has become the content of the University’s Sustainable Design Guidelines (SDG). Campus Facilities continues to hold workshops with division directors semi-annually in order to review the effectiveness of current policies and update the SDG. The campus as a whole has one LEED certified buildings, and six projects in the process of certification.
None
A brief description of how the institution ensures compliance with green building design and construction guidelines and policies:
The University reviews the effectiveness of the SDG and sustainability policies semi-annually. Prior to design and construction, Campus Facilities provides a sustainability packet to consultants and contractors. This packet includes a copy of the SDG, a LEED tracker including standards satisfying the SDG, as well as template specifications and logs to report compliance. Consultants and contractors report compliance with these standards during all major phases of design and construction. The campus also has a full-time manager for sustainable design and construction, whose responsibility is to monitor and advance green building practices.
None
The website URL where information about the institution’s certified buildings and/or green building design and construction guidelines or policies is available:
Data source(s) and notes about the submission:
Tate Hall Renovation (45,250 sq. ft.) was designed and constructed in accordance with the University of Missouri’s Sustainable Design Guidelines and is pursuing a rating of Certified under the 2009 version of LEED for New Construction and Major Renovation. Construction work on the Tate Hall Renovation was declared complete in June of 2011.
Switzler Hall Renovation (28,080 sq. ft.) was designed and constructed in accordance with the University of Missouri’s Sustainable Design Guidelines and is pursuing a rating of Certified under the 2009 version of LEED for New Construction and Major Renovation. Construction work on the Switzler Hall Renovation was declared complete in July of 2011.
Gwynn Hall Renovation (36,196 sq. ft.) was designed and constructed in accordance with the University of Missouri’s Sustainable Design Guidelines and is pursuing a rating of Certified under the 2009 version of LEED for New Construction and Major Renovation. Construction work on the Tate Hall Renovation was declared complete in November of 2013.
This totals 109,526 sq. ft. in gross floor area for buildings designed and constructed in accordance with the University of Missouri’s Sustainable Design Guidelines while also pursuing LEED certification.
The information presented here is self-reported. While AASHE staff review portions of all STARS reports and institutions are welcome to seek additional forms of review, the data in STARS reports are not verified by AASHE. If you believe any of this information is erroneous or inconsistent with credit criteria, please review the process for inquiring about the information reported by an institution or simply email your inquiry to stars@aashe.org.